The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Division of Kidney Disease and Hypertension, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Providence, RI, USA.
Hosp Pract (1995). 2023 Feb;51(1):18-28. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2023.2170613. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
Although hemodialysis continues to be the dominant form of dialysis in the United States, peritoneal dialysis rates continue to rise both nationally and worldwide. Peritoneal dialysis offers patients increased flexibility due to the ability to dialyze at home, leading to potential quality of life benefits for patients. However, questions exist regarding clinical outcomes in patients on peritoneal dialysis and the literature has not recently been reviewed. This review examines hospitalizations within patients utilizing peritoneal dialysis, including comparison to other dialysis modalities. Much heterogeneity exists within the literature, often explained by patient population. Recent data show all-cause, cardiovascular, and infection-related hospitalizations to be high in patients on peritoneal dialysis, although data variation limits conclusions in comparison to other modalities. This review found there is insufficient evidence to suggest admission rates are different in peritoneal dialysis than in-center hemodialysis. While the rate is similar to infectious causes, most studies report cardiovascular complications to be the leading cause of hospitalization. Some evidence suggests that cardiovascular hospitalizations occur at a higher rate in peritoneal dialysis, but further studies are required. The infection-related hospitalization rate appears to be higher in peritoneal dialysis due to rates of peritonitis, but rates of life-threatening bacteremia are lower. Differences in reporting of hospital days vs. length of stay challenge the interpretability of length of stay data between modalities, but patients on PD may spend more days per year in the hospital. In summary, hospitalization is highly prevalent in patients on peritoneal dialysis and few definitive conclusions can be drawn in comparison to other dialysis modalities. In eligible patient populations who desire increased flexibility, peritoneal dialysis is a reasonable modality choice.
尽管血液透析在美国仍然是主要的透析形式,但腹膜透析的比例在全国乃至全球范围内都在持续上升。腹膜透析为患者提供了更大的灵活性,因为患者可以在家中进行透析,从而有可能提高患者的生活质量。然而,腹膜透析患者的临床结局存在一些问题,而且最近的文献也没有进行综述。本综述检查了接受腹膜透析治疗的患者的住院情况,包括与其他透析方式的比较。文献中存在很大的异质性,通常可以用患者人群来解释。最近的数据显示,腹膜透析患者的全因、心血管和感染相关住院率较高,尽管数据的变异性限制了与其他方式的比较得出结论。本综述发现,没有足够的证据表明腹膜透析患者的住院率与中心血液透析不同。虽然与感染原因的比率相似,但大多数研究报告心血管并发症是导致住院的主要原因。一些证据表明,心血管住院的发生率在腹膜透析中更高,但需要进一步的研究。由于腹膜炎的发生率较高,腹膜透析患者的感染相关住院率似乎较高,但危及生命的菌血症的发生率较低。住院天数与住院时间的报告差异挑战了不同方式之间住院时间数据的可解释性,但腹膜透析患者每年在医院的住院天数可能更多。总之,腹膜透析患者的住院率很高,与其他透析方式相比,几乎无法得出明确的结论。在希望增加灵活性的合格患者人群中,腹膜透析是一种合理的治疗选择。