Mittal Amit K, Dubey Jitendra, Shukla Seema, Bhasin Nikhil, Dubey Mamta, Jaipuria Jiten
Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute, New Delhi, India.
Department of Surgical Oncosurgery, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute, New Delhi, India.
Indian J Anaesth. 2022 Dec;66(12):818-825. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_25_22. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
During robotic pelvic surgeries, the shortening of endotracheal tube (ETT) tip-to-carina distance (D) during pneumoperitoneum with 45° Trendelenburg position can result in endobronchial tube migration. In the three-point ETT cuff palpation (TPP) technique, maximal ETT cuff distension is felt over the tracheal segment located between the cricoid-thyroid membrane and suprasternal notch, which is likely to provide optimal placement. However, the reproducibility and reliability of the TPP technique in preventing endobronchial tube migration are yet to be evaluated. Hence, we compared three ETT placement techniques: TPP technique, intubation guide mark (IGM) technique and Varshney's formula (VF) for the prevention of endobronchial tube migration during robotic pelvic surgeries.
ETT placement by TPP was compared with IGM and VF techniques in 100 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical class II-III patients, by assessing the serial changes in D and incidence of endobronchial tube migration throughout the different phases of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position using t-test and Chi-square test. Changes in the D during various phases were also measured.
D (mean ± standard deviation) at baseline and during pneumoperitoneum was significantly better in TPP technique (2.80 ± 0.62 cm and 1.96 ± 0.66 cm) as compared to both IGM (2.50 ± 1.27 cm and 1.41 ± 1.29 cm) and VF techniques (1.83 ± 1.13 cm and 0.98 ± 1.18 cm), < 0.001. During pneumoperitoneum, the mean shortening of D was 0.84 ± 0.20 cm, and no endobronchial tube migration was found in TPP technique compared to 20% in IGM and 25% in VF techniques, < 0.001.
TPP is a simple and reliable technique, which provides optimal ETT placement and prevents endobronchial tube migration throughout the different phases of robotic pelvic surgeries.
在机器人辅助盆腔手术中,气腹并采用45°头低脚高位时,气管内导管(ETT)尖端至隆突距离(D)缩短可导致支气管内导管移位。在三点式ETT套囊触诊(TPP)技术中,在环状软骨-甲状软骨膜与胸骨上切迹之间的气管段可感觉到ETT套囊最大程度扩张,这可能提供最佳放置位置。然而,TPP技术在预防支气管内导管移位方面的可重复性和可靠性尚未得到评估。因此,我们比较了三种ETT放置技术:TPP技术、插管引导标记(IGM)技术和瓦尔什尼公式(VF),以预防机器人辅助盆腔手术期间支气管内导管移位。
在100例美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分级为II-III级的患者中,通过t检验和卡方检验评估气腹和头低脚高位不同阶段D的系列变化以及支气管内导管移位的发生率,比较TPP与IGM和VF技术放置ETT的情况。还测量了不同阶段D的变化。
与IGM(2.50±1.27 cm和1.41±1.29 cm)和VF技术(1.83±1.13 cm和0.98±1.18 cm)相比,TPP技术在基线和气腹期间的D(平均值±标准差)明显更好(2.80±0.62 cm和1.96±0.66 cm),<0.001。气腹期间,D的平均缩短为0.84±0.20 cm,TPP技术未发现支气管内导管移位,而IGM技术为20%,VF技术为25%,<0.001。
TPP是一种简单可靠的技术,可提供最佳的ETT放置位置,并在机器人辅助盆腔手术的不同阶段预防支气管内导管移位。