Bonnin Rémy A, Bernabeu Sandrine, Emeraud Cécile, Naas Thierry, Girlich Delphine, Jousset Agnès B, Dortet Laurent
Team "Resist" UMR1184 "Immunology of Viral, Auto-Immune, Hematological and Bacterial Diseases (IMVA-HB)", INSERM, Faculty of Medicine, Paris-Saclay University, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Associated French National Reference Center for Antibiotic Resistance: Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriales, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Jan 6;12(1):102. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12010102.
Background: Avibactam, relebactam and vaborbactam are β-lactamase inhibitors that proved their efficiency against KPC-producing Enterobacterales. Regarding their inhibitor activity towards Ambler’s class A extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) and Ambler’s class C cephalosporinase (AmpC), they should be active on most of the carbapenem-resistant non-carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CR non-CPE). Objectives: Determine the in vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam and meropenem-vaborbactam and comparators against CR non-CPE. Methods: MICs to ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, but also temocillin, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ertapenem, colistin, eravacycline and tigecycline were determined by broth microdilution (ThermoFisher) on a collection of 284 CR non-CPE (inhibition zone diameter < 22 mm to meropenem). Whole genome sequencing was performed on 90 isolates to assess the genetic diversity as well as resistome. Results: According to EUCAST breakpoints, susceptibility rates of ceftazidime, imipenem, meropenem and ertapenem used at standard dose were 0.7%, 45.1%, 14.8% and 2.5%, respectively. Increased exposure of ceftazidime, imipenem and meropenem led to reach 3.5%, 68.3% and 67.7% susceptibility, respectively. Using the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, susceptibility rates of ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam were 88.4%, 81.0% and 80.6%, respectively. Susceptibility rates of temocillin, ceftolozane/tazobactam, tigecycline, eravacycline, and colistin were 0%, 4.6%, 27.8%, 54.9% and 90.1%. MICs distributions with and without the presence of the inhibitor demonstrated a better ability of avibactam and relebactam compared to vaborbactam to restore susceptibility to the associated β-lactam. Conclusions: This study demonstrated the in vitro efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and to a lesser extent meropenem/vaborbactam against CR non-CPE. Moreover, to test all β-lactams/β-lactamases inhibitors combinations without a priori for CRE, non-CPE is crucial since resistance to one of the β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations does not predict resistance to another molecule, depending on the resistance mechanisms involved.
阿维巴坦、瑞来巴坦和瓦博巴坦是β-内酰胺酶抑制剂,已证明它们对产KPC的肠杆菌科细菌有效。关于它们对安布勒A类超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)和安布勒C类头孢菌素酶(AmpC)的抑制活性,它们应对大多数耐碳青霉烯类非碳青霉烯酶产生的肠杆菌科细菌(CR非CPE)具有活性。目的:确定头孢他啶-阿维巴坦、亚胺培南-瑞来巴坦和美罗培南-瓦博巴坦及其对照药物对CR非CPE的体外活性。方法:采用肉汤微量稀释法(赛默飞世尔)对284株CR非CPE(美罗培南抑菌圈直径<22 mm)测定头孢他啶/阿维巴坦、亚胺培南/瑞来巴坦、美罗培南/瓦博巴坦以及替莫西林、头孢洛扎/他唑巴坦、厄他培南、黏菌素、依拉环素和替加环素的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。对90株分离株进行全基因组测序,以评估遗传多样性和耐药组。结果:根据欧盟CAST标准,标准剂量使用的头孢他啶、亚胺培南、美罗培南和厄他培南的敏感率分别为0.7%、45.1%、14.8%和2.5%。增加头孢他啶、亚胺培南和美罗培南的暴露量后,敏感率分别达到3.5%、68.3%和67.7%。根据欧盟CAST临床标准,头孢他啶/阿维巴坦、亚胺培南/瑞来巴坦和美罗培南/瓦博巴坦的敏感率分别为88.4%、81.0%和80.6%。替莫西林、头孢洛扎/他唑巴坦、替加环素、依拉环素和黏菌素的敏感率分别为0%、4.6%、27.8%、54.9%和90.1%。有抑制剂和无抑制剂情况下的MIC分布表明,与瓦博巴坦相比,阿维巴坦和瑞来巴坦恢复对相关β-内酰胺敏感性的能力更强。结论:本研究证明了头孢他啶/阿维巴坦、亚胺培南/瑞来巴坦以及在较小程度上美罗培南/瓦博巴坦对CR非CPE的体外疗效。此外,对于耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌(CRE),在没有先验知识的情况下检测所有β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合对非CPE至关重要,因为对一种β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合的耐药性并不预示对另一种分子的耐药性,这取决于所涉及的耐药机制。