术中效价测试在深部脑刺激治疗强迫症中用于裁决腹侧壳核/腹侧纹状体和终纹床核靶点选择。

Intraoperative valence testing to adjudicate between ventral capsule/ventral striatum and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis target selection in deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder.

机构信息

1Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; and.

Departments of2Neurosurgery and.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 2022 Dec 9;139(2):442-450. doi: 10.3171/2022.10.JNS221683. Print 2023 Aug 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an accepted therapy for severe, treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (trOCD). The optimal DBS target location within the anterior limb of the internal capsule, particularly along the anterior-posterior axis, remains elusive. Empirical evidence from several studies in the past decade has suggested that the ideal target lies in the vicinity of the anterior commissure (AC), either just anterior to the AC, above the ventral striatum (VS), or just posterior to the AC, above the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST). Various methods have been utilized to optimize target selection for trOCD DBS. The authors describe their practice of planning trajectories to both the VS and BNST and adjudicating between them with awake intraoperative valence testing to individualize permanent target selection.

METHODS

Eight patients with trOCD underwent awake DBS with trajectories planned for both VS and BNST targets bilaterally. The authors intraoperatively assessed the acute effects of stimulation on mood, energy, and anxiety and implanted the trajectory with the most reliable positive valence responses and least stimulation-induced side effects. The method of intraoperative target adjudication is described, and the OCD outcome at last follow-up is reported.

RESULTS

The mean patient age at surgery was 41.25 ± 15.1 years, and the mean disease duration was 22.75 ± 10.2 years. The median preoperative Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) score was 39 (range 34-40). Two patients had previously undergone capsulotomy, with insufficient response. Seven (44%) of 16 leads were moved to the second target based on intraoperative stimulation findings, 4 of them to avoid strong negative valence effects. Three patients had an asymmetric implant (1 lead in each target). All 8 patients (100%) met full response criteria, and the mean Y-BOCS score reduction across the full cohort was 51.2% ± 12.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Planning and intraoperatively testing trajectories flanking the AC-superjacent to the VS anteriorly and to the BNST posteriorly-allowed identification of positive valence responses and acute adverse effects. Awake testing helped to select between possible trajectories and identify individually optimized targets in DBS for trOCD.

摘要

目的

深部脑刺激(DBS)是治疗严重、药物难治性强迫症(trOCD)的一种公认的疗法。在前内囊的前肢内,特别是在前-后轴上,最佳的 DBS 目标位置仍难以捉摸。过去十年的几项研究的实证证据表明,理想的目标位于前连合(AC)附近,要么就在 AC 之前,在腹侧纹状体(VS)上方,要么就在 AC 之后,在终纹床核(BNST)上方。已经使用了各种方法来优化 trOCD DBS 的目标选择。作者描述了他们规划双侧 VS 和 BNST 轨迹的实践,并通过清醒术中效价测试来判断轨迹,从而实现个体化的永久性目标选择。

方法

8 例 trOCD 患者接受清醒 DBS,双侧均计划进行 VS 和 BNST 目标的轨迹规划。作者术中评估了刺激对情绪、能量和焦虑的急性影响,并植入了具有最可靠正效价反应和最少刺激诱导副作用的轨迹。描述了术中目标裁决的方法,并报告了最后一次随访时的 OCD 结果。

结果

手术时患者的平均年龄为 41.25±15.1 岁,平均病程为 22.75±10.2 年。术前耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(Y-BOCS)的中位数为 39(范围 34-40)。2 例患者曾行壳核切开术,但反应不足。根据术中刺激发现,有 7(44%)例 16 个导联移至第二个目标,其中 4 个导联移至第二个目标是为了避免强烈的负效价效应。3 例患者的植入物不对称(每个目标各有 1 个导联)。8 例患者(100%)均符合完全反应标准,整个队列的 Y-BOCS 评分平均降低了 51.2%±12.8%。

结论

规划并在 AC 上方、VS 前侧和 BNST 后侧的轨迹进行术中测试,有助于确定正效价反应和急性不良反应。清醒测试有助于在 DBS 治疗 trOCD 中对可能的轨迹进行选择,并确定个体化优化的目标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索