Department of Urology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Department of Urology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Eur Urol Oncol. 2023 Jun;6(3):237-250. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.01.001. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
CONTEXT: Androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSi) agents are emerging as standard treatments for prostate cancer across the disease spectrum, but much remains unknown regarding how their side-effect profiles compare. OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate the literature regarding adverse events (AEs) between the ARSi drugs abiraterone, apalutamide, darolutamide, and enzalutamide in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), nonmetastatic CRPC (nmCRPC), and metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were queried for double-blind, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ARSi therapy up to September 2022 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Two teams reviewed titles and abstracts, and 14 RCTs were included for analysis. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Forest plots were used to summarize risk ratios for the most common AEs. According to surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values, enzalutamide was ranked as the most toxic treatment regarding hypertension outcomes (SUCRA 0%, most likely to be the bottom-ranked treatment) in both mCRPC and nmCRPC (SUCRA 0%). Enzalutamide was also ranked as the most toxic regarding headache across all prostate cancer entities (SUCRA 0%, for mCRPC, 1% for nmCRPC, and 3% for mCSPC). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the ARSi side-effect profiles do not significantly differ, except that enzalutamide was ranked the most toxic regarding hypertension in mCRPC and nmCRPC, and the most toxic regarding headache across all prostate cancer settings. These results highlight the importance of close blood-pressure monitoring for enzalutamide, and future research should explore possible connections between cardiovascular and neurological risk with ARSi therapy. In addition, these comparisons rely on the validity of cross-trial comparisons. PATIENT SUMMARY: We reviewed the side-effect profiles of second-generation antiandrogen drugs for the treatment of prostate cancer. Side effects were similar, apart from higher risk of high blood pressure and headache risk with enzalutamide.
背景:雄激素受体信号抑制剂(ARSi)已成为治疗前列腺癌各阶段的标准治疗方法,但对于它们的副作用谱如何比较,仍有许多未知之处。
目的:系统评估 ARSi 药物阿比特龙、阿帕鲁胺、达罗他胺和恩扎卢胺在治疗转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)、非转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(nmCRPC)和转移性去势敏感性前列腺癌(mCSPC)中的不良反应(AE)文献。
证据获取:根据 PRISMA 声明,从 2022 年 9 月前在 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Embase 上检索 ARSi 治疗的双盲、随机对照试验(RCT)。两个团队分别对标题和摘要进行了审查,最终纳入了 14 项 RCT 进行分析。
证据综合:使用森林图总结最常见 AE 的风险比。根据累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)值,恩扎卢胺在 mCRPC 和 nmCRPC 中被评为高血压结局毒性最大的治疗药物(SUCRA 0%,最有可能排在最后)(SUCRA 0%)。在所有前列腺癌实体中,恩扎卢胺也被评为最易引起头痛的药物(SUCRA 0%,mCRPC 为 1%,nmCRPC 为 3%,mCSPC 为 3%)。
结论:我们的研究结果表明,ARSi 的副作用谱没有显著差异,只是恩扎卢胺在 mCRPC 和 nmCRPC 中被评为高血压毒性最大,在所有前列腺癌环境中被评为头痛毒性最大。这些结果强调了对恩扎卢胺进行密切血压监测的重要性,未来的研究应该探讨 ARSi 治疗与心血管和神经风险之间的可能联系。此外,这些比较依赖于跨试验比较的有效性。
患者总结:我们回顾了第二代抗雄激素药物治疗前列腺癌的副作用谱。除了恩扎卢胺发生高血压和头痛的风险更高外,这些药物的副作用相似。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-1-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-12-3
Health Technol Assess. 2024-10
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-6
Biomedicines. 2025-5-12
Nat Rev Urol. 2025-2-26