文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

术前奥斯维斯特里功能障碍指数不能可靠预测单节段和双节段腰椎经椎间孔椎体间融合术后的患者满意度。

Preoperative Oswestry Disability Index Cannot Reliably Predict Patient Satisfaction After Single and Double Level Lumbar Transforaminal Interbody Fusion Surgery.

作者信息

Teo Bryon Jun Xiong, Howe Tet Sen, Chan Cheri, Koh Joyce Sb, Yeo William, Ng Yeong Huei

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.

Orthopaedic Diagnostic Centre, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.

出版信息

Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2023 Jan 15;14:21514593231152172. doi: 10.1177/21514593231152172. eCollection 2023.


DOI:10.1177/21514593231152172
PMID:36687777
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9846293/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The role of patient-reported outcomes in preoperative assessment is not well studied. There is recent interest in studying whether Patient-reported outcomes scores can be used either independently, or in conjunction with clinical findings, in the assessment of patients for surgery. AIMS: To investigate if improvement in clinically significant scores correlate with post-operative patient satisfaction in 1-2 level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgery. We also aim to define a threshold Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) which correlate with achieving post-operative MCID and patient satisfaction. METHODS: 1001 patients who underwent single or double level TLIF (Minimally invasive and Open) in our institution with at least 2 years follow up were included in this study. We studied self-reported measures including patient satisfaction and ODI score. RESULTS: At 2-year follow-up, the overall mean ODI score improved from 49.7 ± 18.3 to 13.9 ± 15.2 ( < 0.001) with 74.6% of patients meeting the MCID. Patient satisfaction was achieved in 95.3% of all patients. In the MIS group, the preoperative cut-off was determined to be 37.2 at maximal Youden index associated with AUC of 0.72 (95% CI 0.65-0.86). In the open group, the preoperative cut-off was determined to be 37.2 at maximal Youden index associated with AUC of 0.70 (95% CI 0.62-0.77). Using the preoperative cut-offs found, there was no significant difference in patient satisfaction in both MIS and open groups. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our patients undergoing TLIF had good 2-year ODI score improvement and patient satisfaction after surgery. While meeting the MCID for ODI score correlates with patients' satisfaction postoperatively, 75% of patients not meeting the MCID for ODI score remained satisfied with the surgery. We are unable to define a threshold pre-operative ODI which correlates with achieving post-operative MCID and patient satisfaction.

摘要

引言:患者报告结局在术前评估中的作用尚未得到充分研究。最近人们对研究患者报告结局评分是否可单独使用,或与临床检查结果相结合,用于手术患者评估产生了兴趣。 目的:探讨在1-2节段经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)中,具有临床意义的评分改善是否与术后患者满意度相关。我们还旨在确定一个与实现术后最小临床重要差异(MCID)和患者满意度相关的Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)阈值。 方法:本研究纳入了在我们机构接受单节段或双节段TLIF(微创和开放手术)且至少随访2年的1001例患者。我们研究了自我报告的指标,包括患者满意度和ODI评分。 结果:在2年随访时,总体平均ODI评分从49.7±18.3改善至13.9±15.2(P<0.001),74.6%的患者达到MCID。所有患者中有95.3%实现了患者满意度。在微创组中,与曲线下面积(AUC)为0.72(95%可信区间0.65-0.86)相关的最大约登指数处,术前截断值确定为37.2。在开放组中,与AUC为0.70(95%可信区间0.62-0.77)相关的最大约登指数处,术前截断值确定为37.2。使用所发现的术前截断值,微创组和开放组的患者满意度无显著差异。 结论:总体而言,接受TLIF手术的患者术后2年ODI评分改善良好且患者满意度较高。虽然达到ODI评分的MCID与患者术后满意度相关,但75%未达到ODI评分MCID的患者对手术仍感到满意。我们无法确定一个与实现术后MCID和患者满意度相关的术前ODI阈值。

相似文献

[1]
Preoperative Oswestry Disability Index Cannot Reliably Predict Patient Satisfaction After Single and Double Level Lumbar Transforaminal Interbody Fusion Surgery.

Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2023-1-15

[2]
The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Disability on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

World Neurosurg. 2022-3

[3]
Comparison of Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.

Orthop Surg. 2021-10

[4]
Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?

J Neurosurg Spine. 2016-12

[5]
Psychological and Functional Comparison between Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Orthop Surg. 2021-6

[6]
A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Neurosurg Focus. 2019-5-1

[7]
Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2011-2-18

[8]
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2014-4-18

[9]
Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.

Neurosurg Focus. 2018-1

[10]
Comparison of hidden blood loss and clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Int Orthop. 2022-9

引用本文的文献

[1]
Preoperative risk factors for nonsatisfaction after lumbar interbody fusion.

Brain Spine. 2024-3-22

本文引用的文献

[1]
Predicting recovery after lumbar spinal stenosis surgery: A protocol for a historical cohort study using data from the Canadian Spine Outcomes Research Network (CSORN).

Can J Pain. 2020-12-30

[2]
Longitudinal Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System for Back and Leg Pain in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Neurospine. 2020-12

[3]
Are Patient-Reported Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Influenced by Preoperative Mental Health?

Global Spine J. 2021-5

[4]
Preoperative Mental Health May Not Be Predictive of Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcomes Following a Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Int J Spine Surg. 2020-2-29

[5]
Patients With Poor Baseline Mental Health May Experience Significant Improvements in Pain and Disability After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A 5-Year Follow-up Study.

Clin Spine Surg. 2020-6

[6]
The Influence of Preoperative Mental Health on PROMIS Physical Function Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020-2-15

[7]
Association of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary Score With Patient Satisfaction and Improvement 2 Years After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

JAMA Netw Open. 2019-2-1

[8]
Preoperative Leg Pain Score Predicts Patient Satisfaction After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery.

Global Spine J. 2018-6

[9]
The Predictive Value of Preoperative Health-Related Quality-of-Life Scores on Postoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Scores in Lumbar Spine Surgery.

Global Spine J. 2018-4

[10]
Patient-Reported Outcomes - Are They Living Up to Their Potential?

N Engl J Med. 2017-7-6

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索