Suppr超能文献

内镜与显微镜下面神经减压治疗外伤性面神经麻痹:一项随机对照试验。

Endoscopic vs microscopic facial nerve decompression for traumatic facial nerve palsy: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Institute of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research and SSKM Hospital, 244 AJC Bose Road, Kolkata, 700020, India.

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Jul;280(7):3187-3194. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-07836-x. Epub 2023 Jan 23.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To explore a minimally invasive trans-canal endoscopic facial nerve decompression for traumatic facial nerve palsy and compare it with microscopic facial nerve decompression.

METHODS

35 and 38 patients underwent endoscopic and microscopic facial nerve decompression, respectively, for traumatic facial nerve palsy. Onset of symptoms, type of temporal bone fracture, day of surgical intervention following trauma, ossicular chain status and nature of insult to facial nerve were observed. Time period for recovery (House Brackmann grade ≤ 3), long term recovery rates, pre- and post-operative hearing status, surgical time and post-operative pain were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Maximum patients in endoscopic and microscopic groups (77.1% and 76.3%, respectively) had acute onset of symptoms. 57.1% (20/35) had longitudinal, 17.1% (6/35) had transverse and 25.7% (9/35) had mixed fractures in endoscopic group. In the microscopic group, 57.9% (22/38) had longitudinal, 18.4% (7/38) had transverse and 23.7% (9/38) had mixed fractures. The mean (± S.D.) post-operative air-bone gap in endoscopic and microscopic group were 16.47 ± 4.5 dB and 19.4 ± 5.2 dB, respectively, which was statistically significant. The mean (± S.D.) time period for recovery of endoscopic and microscopic groups were 14.4 ± 5 days and 22.5 ± 7 days, respectively (p value < 0.05). The difference in post-operative pain between the two groups was also statistically significant. The difference in long term recovery rates was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic facial nerve decompression results in early recovery, less post-operative pain and better post-operative air-bone gap closure when compared to conventional microscopic technique.

摘要

目的

探讨经耳内镜面神经减压术治疗外伤性面神经麻痹的疗效,并与显微镜下面神经减压术进行比较。

方法

分别对 35 例和 38 例行内镜和显微镜下面神经减压术的外伤性面神经麻痹患者进行研究。观察症状发作时间、颞骨骨折类型、外伤后手术干预时间、听骨链状态及面神经损伤性质。比较两组患者的恢复时间(House Brackmann 分级≤3)、长期恢复率、术前和术后听力状况、手术时间和术后疼痛。

结果

内镜组和显微镜组中,最大比例的患者(分别为 77.1%和 76.3%)症状急性发作。内镜组中,57.1%(20/35)为纵行骨折,17.1%(6/35)为横行骨折,25.7%(9/35)为混合骨折。显微镜组中,57.9%(22/38)为纵行骨折,18.4%(7/38)为横行骨折,23.7%(9/38)为混合骨折。内镜组和显微镜组术后气骨导差分别为 16.47±4.5dB 和 19.4±5.2dB,差异有统计学意义。内镜组和显微镜组的平均恢复时间分别为 14.4±5 天和 22.5±7 天,差异有统计学意义(p 值<0.05)。两组患者术后疼痛差异也有统计学意义。两组患者的长期恢复率差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。

结论

与传统显微镜技术相比,经耳内镜面神经减压术可使患者更早恢复,术后疼痛更少,术后气骨导差闭合更好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验