Department of Ecology and Conservation, National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea, Seocheon, 33662, Republic of Korea; Department of Ocean Environmental Sciences, College of Natural Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, 34134, Republic of Korea.
Department of Biodiversity, National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea, Seocheon, 33662, Republic of Korea; Department of Marine Biotechnology, Kunsan National University, Kunsan, 54150, Republic of Korea.
Mar Environ Res. 2023 Mar;185:105893. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2023.105893. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
Monitoring studies are necessary to understand the biodiversity of marine ecosystems and are useful for identifying and managing rare or invasive species. Because monitoring has traditionally relied only on visual surveys (e.g., trapping, netting, electrofishing, and SCUBA diving) with limited time and physical resources, environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis is being applied as an efficient monitoring method. This study compared whether the eDNA metabarcoding technique can replace the traditional visual survey in an ascidian fauna study. We designed ascidian-specific primers and identified a clear gap (3.75%) by barcoding gap analysis. Then, we collected seawater samples for eDNA analysis during the summer (August-September) of 2021 at three sites (Mokpo, Yeosu, and Uljin) in South Korea. In the survey sites of this study, 25 species were observed through literature and visual survey, among which 9 species were detected by metabarcoding and 16 species were not detected. On the other hand, 10 species were detected only by metabarcoding, and one of them was identified as Pyura mirabilis, an unrecorded species in South Korea. This study succeeded in detecting cryptic or rare species with one seawater collection, which can be used to determine their unexplored habitat. Therefore, we conclude that monitoring using eDNA is more efficient than visual surveys for detecting rare or cryptic ascidian species. We also suggest that, when combined with traditional monitoring methods, it could be a tool to complement ascidian fauna studies.
监测研究对于了解海洋生态系统的生物多样性是必要的,并且有助于识别和管理稀有或入侵物种。由于监测传统上仅依赖于有限时间和物力资源的视觉调查(例如,诱捕、网捕、电捕鱼和水肺潜水),因此正在应用环境 DNA (eDNA) 分析作为一种有效的监测方法。本研究比较了 eDNA 宏条形码技术是否可以替代传统的视觉调查在藤壶动物区系研究中的应用。我们设计了藤壶特异性引物,并通过条形码缺口分析确定了一个明显的缺口(3.75%)。然后,我们在 2021 年 8 月至 9 月的夏季在韩国的三个地点(木浦、丽水和郁陵)采集海水样本进行 eDNA 分析。在本研究的调查地点,通过文献和视觉调查观察到 25 种物种,其中 9 种通过宏条形码检测到,16 种未检测到。另一方面,仅通过宏条形码检测到 10 种物种,其中一种被鉴定为 Pyura mirabilis,这是韩国未记录的物种。本研究成功地从一次海水采集检测到了隐匿或稀有物种,可以用来确定它们未被探索的栖息地。因此,我们得出结论,使用 eDNA 进行监测比视觉调查更有效地检测稀有或隐匿的藤壶物种。我们还建议,当与传统监测方法结合使用时,它可能成为补充藤壶动物区系研究的工具。