接受腹主动脉瘤修复手术的退伍军人中的衰弱情况。

Frailty Among Veterans Undergoing Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

作者信息

Chen Alina J, Yeh Savannah L, Ulloa Jesus G, Gelabert Hugh A, Rigberg David A, de Virgilio Christian M, O'Connell Jessica B

机构信息

David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.

David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2023 May;92:18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.01.007. Epub 2023 Jan 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Frailty is a known risk factor for adverse outcomes following surgery and affects at least 3 of every 10 US Veterans aged 65 years and older. We designed a study to characterize the association between frailty and complications after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) compared to open aneurysm repair (OAR) at our regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

METHODS

Veterans who underwent either OAR or EVAR at our institution between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2020 were identified. We examined medical history, procedure characteristics, perioperative complications, and frailty as measured by the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5). Frailty was defined as an mFI-5 score ≥2. Primary endpoints were postoperative complications, duration of surgery, and length of hospital stay. Tests of association were performed with t-test and chi-squared analysis.

RESULTS

Over the 21-year period, we identified 314 patients that underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair with 115 (36.6%) OAR and 199 EVAR (63.4%) procedures. Patients undergoing EVAR were older on average (72.1 years vs. 70.2 years) and had a higher average mFI-5 compared to the open repair group (1.49 vs. 1.23, P = 0.036). When comparing EVAR and OAR cohorts, patients undergoing OAR had a larger AAA diameter (6.5 cm, standard deviation [SD]: 1.5) compared to EVAR (5.5 cm, SD: 1.1 P < 0.0001). Fewer frail patients underwent OAR (n = 40, 34.8%) compared to EVAR (n = 86, 43.2%), and frail EVAR patients had higher AAA diameter (5.8 cm, SD: 1.0) compared to nonfrail EVAR patients (5.3 cm, SD 1.2), P = 0.003. Among OAR procedures, frail patients had longer operative times (296 min vs. 253 min, P = 0.013) and higher incidence of pneumonia (17.5% vs. 5.3%, P = 0.035). Among frail EVAR patients, operative time and perioperative complications including wound dehiscence, surgical site infection, and pneumonia were not significantly different than their nonfrail counterparts. Overall, frail patients had more early complications (n = 55, 43.7%) as compared to nonfrail patients (n = 48, 25.5%, P = 0.001). OAR patients had higher rates of postoperative complications including wound dehiscence (7.0% vs. 0.5%, P = 0.001), surgical site infections (7.0% vs. 1.0%, P = 0.003), and pneumonia (9.6% vs. 0.5%, P=<0.0001). Open repair was also associated with overall longer average intensive care unit stays (11.0 days vs. 1.6 days, P < 0.0001) and longer average hospitalizations (13.5 days vs. 2.4 days, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate that frailty is associated with higher rates of adverse outcomes in open repair compared to EVAR. Patients who underwent open repair had higher rates of wound dehiscence, surgical site infection, and pneumonia, compared to those undergoing endovascular repair. Frailty was associated with larger AAA diameter in the EVAR cohort and longer operative times, with higher frequency of postoperative pneumonia in the OAR cohort. Frailty is a strong risk factor that should be considered in the management of aortic aneurysms.

摘要

背景

衰弱是手术后不良结局的已知风险因素,在美国每10名65岁及以上的退伍军人中,至少有3人受其影响。我们设计了一项研究,以描述在我们地区的退伍军人事务医疗中心,与开放性动脉瘤修复术(OAR)相比,血管内动脉瘤修复术(EVAR)后衰弱与并发症之间的关联。

方法

确定了2000年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间在我们机构接受OAR或EVAR治疗的退伍军人。我们检查了病史、手术特征、围手术期并发症以及通过5因素改良衰弱指数(mFI-5)测量的衰弱情况。衰弱定义为mFI-5评分≥2。主要终点是术后并发症、手术持续时间和住院时间。采用t检验和卡方分析进行关联性检验。

结果

在这21年期间,我们确定了314例接受腹主动脉瘤(AAA)修复的患者,其中115例(36.6%)接受OAR,199例(63.4%)接受EVAR手术。与开放性修复组相比,接受EVAR的患者平均年龄更大(72.1岁对70.2岁),平均mFI-5更高(1.49对1.23,P = 0.036)。在比较EVAR和OAR队列时,接受OAR的患者AAA直径更大(6.5 cm,标准差[SD]:1.5),而EVAR患者为(5.5 cm,SD:1.1,P < 0.0001)。与EVAR(n = 86,43.2%)相比,接受OAR的衰弱患者更少(n = 40,34.8%),并且衰弱的EVAR患者的AAA直径(5.8 cm,SD:1.0)高于非衰弱的EVAR患者(5.3 cm,SD 1.2),P = 0.003。在OAR手术中,衰弱患者的手术时间更长(296分钟对25

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索