Takeda Yukihisa, Takahashi Maki, Fuchikami Jun-Ichi, Nakamura Hiroyuki, Aoshiba Kazutetsu
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Tokyo Medical University Ibaraki Medical Center, 3-20-1 Chuou, Ami-machi, Inashiki-gun, Ibaraki, 300-0395, Japan.
CMIC Pharma Science Co., Ltd., Bioresearch Center, 10221 Kobuchisawa-cho, Hokuto-shi, Yamanashi, 408-0044, Japan.
Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Apr;79:102198. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2023.102198. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
Cigarette smoking constitutes a risk factor for severe asthma, which is frequently linked to remodeling of the airways. Appropriate drug treatment for smokers with asthma is uncertain because many smokers with asthma are less sensitive to glucocorticoid treatment than non-smokers with asthma. The purpose of this study was to compare the anti-airway remodeling effects of dexamethasone (Dex) and roflumilast (Rof), a selective phosphodiesterases-4 inhibitor, in smoking and non-smoking mice with asthma. BALB/c mice were sensitized with ovalbumin (OVA) and then challenged with OVA for two weeks, either with or without concurrent exposure to cigarette smoke (CS). Dex (1 mg/kg body weight), Rof (5 mg/kg body weight), or vehicle alone was given orally to the mice once daily. To assess the histopathological effects of airway remodeling, lung tissue sections were obtained. Repeated OVA challenges resulted in fibrosis, goblet cell hyperplasia, and thickening of the airway but not the smooth muscle layer. The presence of CS did not have an impact on the degree of airway remodeling brought on by repeated OVA challenges. In mice repeatedly exposed to OVA either with or without CS, Dex treatment reduced the remodeling alterations. In these mice group, the Rof Treatment had a less significant impact than the Dex treatment. Dex was still more effective than Rof at reducing airway remodeling in asthmatic smoking mice. According to the current study's findings, Dex effectively prevented airway remodeling in a two-week asthma model in mice exposed to CS or not. In contrast, we found that Rof had little to no inhibitory effect of Rof on the airway in our mouse model of asthma, whether or not it had been exposed to CS. We were unable to find solid proof to support CS-induced steroid resistance to treat airway remodeling.
吸烟是重度哮喘的一个风险因素,重度哮喘常与气道重塑有关。哮喘吸烟者的合适药物治疗尚不确定,因为许多哮喘吸烟者对糖皮质激素治疗的敏感性低于非吸烟哮喘患者。本研究的目的是比较地塞米松(Dex)和选择性磷酸二酯酶-4抑制剂罗氟司特(Rof)在吸烟和不吸烟哮喘小鼠中抗气道重塑的作用。将BALB/c小鼠用卵清蛋白(OVA)致敏,然后用OVA激发两周,同时或不同时暴露于香烟烟雾(CS)。每天给小鼠口服一次Dex(1mg/kg体重)、Rof(5mg/kg体重)或单独的赋形剂。为了评估气道重塑的组织病理学效应,获取肺组织切片。重复OVA激发导致纤维化、杯状细胞增生和气道增厚,但平滑肌层未增厚。CS的存在对重复OVA激发引起的气道重塑程度没有影响。在反复暴露于OVA的小鼠中,无论是否有CS,Dex治疗均减少了重塑改变。在这些小鼠组中,Rof治疗的影响不如Dex治疗显著。在减轻哮喘吸烟小鼠的气道重塑方面,Dex仍然比Rof更有效。根据本研究的结果,Dex在暴露或未暴露于CS的小鼠两周哮喘模型中有效预防了气道重塑。相比之下,我们发现在我们的哮喘小鼠模型中,无论是否暴露于CS,Rof对气道几乎没有抑制作用。我们未能找到确凿证据支持CS诱导的类固醇抵抗用于治疗气道重塑。