Suppr超能文献

在亚洲人群的时间限制条件下,相较于AO/OTA和Lauge-Hansen分类系统,Weber踝关节骨折分类系统具有最高的观察者间和观察者内可靠性。

Weber Ankle Fracture Classification System Yields Greatest Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability Over AO/OTA and Lauge-Hansen Classification Systems Under Time Constraints in an Asian Population.

作者信息

Glen Liau Zi Qiang, Wong Joel Yat Seng, Tay Wei Xuan, Li Tian Pei, Phua Sean Kean Ann, Manohara Ruben, Chee Yu Han

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

J Foot Ankle Surg. 2023 May-Jun;62(3):505-510. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2022.12.004. Epub 2022 Dec 27.

Abstract

No previous studies have evaluated the intra- and interobserver reliability between the Weber, Lauge-Hansen and AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification systems under time constraints. This study compares the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the aforementioned classification systems under simulated time constraints. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of ankle malleolar fractures from 80 consecutive patients from 2015 to 2016 were classified by 2 independent observers according to Weber, Lauge-Hansen and AO/OTA. Classifications were conducted over 4 successive weeks under timed (25-seconds) and untimed conditions, with 1-week gaps between each classification. Cohen's kappa and percentage agreement were calculated. Cohen's kappa for interobserver agreement ranged 0.67 to 0.67 and 0.59 to 0.73 for untimed and timed classifications for Weber; 0.38 to 0.47 and 0.44 to 0.50 for Lauge-Hansen; 0.28 to 0.49 and 0.13 to 0.37 for AO/OTA. Intraobserver agreement ranged from 0.83 to 0.85 and 0.78 to 0.79 for untimed and timed classifications for Weber; 0.46 to 0.65 and 0.59 to 0.73 for Lauge-Hansen; 0.42 to 0.63 and 0.40 to 0.51 for AO/OTA. Based on the Landis and Koch's benchmark scale, there was substantial agreement in the inter- and intraobserver variables for Weber; moderate agreement in inter- and intraobserver variables for Lauge-Hansen; fair and moderate agreement in inter- and intraobserver variables respectively for AO/OTA. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability was the most substantial for Weber, followed by Lauge-Hansen and AO/OTA. Time constraint did not have a statistically significant effect on the reliability of classifications. We recommend concurrent usage of the Weber and Lauge-Hansen system, since they demonstrate the greatest reliability and reproducibility, and confer better understanding of the fracture type, respectively.

摘要

以往尚无研究在时间限制条件下评估Weber、Lauge-Hansen和AO基金会/骨创伤协会(AO/OTA)分类系统的观察者间及观察者内可靠性。本研究比较了上述分类系统在模拟时间限制条件下的观察者间和观察者内可靠性。2015年至2016年连续80例患者的踝关节骨折前后位和侧位X线片由2名独立观察者根据Weber、Lauge-Hansen和AO/OTA进行分类。分类在连续4周内于有时间限制(25秒)和无时间限制的条件下进行,每次分类之间间隔1周。计算Cohen's kappa系数和百分比一致性。Weber分类系统在无时间限制和有时间限制分类时观察者间一致性的Cohen's kappa系数分别为0.67至0.67和0.59至0.73;Lauge-Hansen分类系统分别为0.38至0.47和0.44至0.50;AO/OTA分类系统分别为0.28至0.49和0.13至0.37。Weber分类系统在无时间限制和有时间限制分类时观察者内一致性范围分别为0.83至0.85和0.78至0.79;Lauge-Hansen分类系统分别为0.46至0.65和0.59至0.73;AO/OTA分类系统分别为0.42至0.63和0.40至0.51。根据Landis和Koch的基准量表,Weber分类系统的观察者间和观察者内变量一致性为实质性;Lauge-Hansen分类系统为中等一致性;AO/OTA分类系统的观察者间和观察者内变量一致性分别为一般和中等一致性。Weber分类系统的观察者间和观察者内可靠性最高,其次是Lauge-Hansen和AO/OTA。时间限制对分类的可靠性没有统计学上的显著影响。我们建议同时使用Weber和Lauge-Hansen系统,因为它们分别具有最高的可靠性和可重复性,并且能更好地理解骨折类型。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验