Tendon Transfers, Nerve Grafts, and Nerve Transfers for Isolated Radial Nerve Palsy: A Systematic Review and Analysis.

BACKGROUND

Isolated radial nerve palsy is a debilitating injury that may potentially be reconstructed with either tendon transfers, nerve grafts, or nerve transfers. Currently, there is no consensus on the optimal technique for reconstruction. We performed a systematic review and analysis to determine which surgical intervention provides the best clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Twenty-nine papers met inclusion criteria. Grading scales of function and strength were converted into a tripartite scoring system to compare outcomes between techniques. χ analyses were performed with a value < .05.

RESULTS

Seven hundred fifty-four patients were analyzed. Tendon transfers resulted in the highest percentage of good outcomes (82%) and the lowest percentage of poor outcomes (9%). Tendon transfers were superior to nerve grafts and nerve transfers for restoration of wrist extension. Nerve transfers for wrist extension were superior to nerve transfers for finger extension. Nerve grafts and nerve transfers had equivalent rates of good and poor clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study analyzed reported outcomes of tendon transfers, nerve grafts, and nerve transfers for reconstruction of isolated radial nerve palsy. On pooled analysis, tendon transfers had higher rates of superior clinical outcomes as compared with nerve transfers and nerve grafts. Tendon transfers should be considered first-line reconstruction for isolated radial nerve palsy as nerve-based reconstruction is less predictable and reproducible.