Mengden H J, Just H, Kaspar W, Löllgen H, Kersting F
Z Kardiol. 1978 Oct;67(10):707-16.
A fully automated Ecg recording and interpretation system (Hewlett Packard HP 5) consisting of a central computer and two peripheral units was evaluated during a four-month period. Ecgs were transmitted via public telephone lines, as was the report from central station to peripheral recording and print-out unit. Within a few seconds after recording and print-out unit. Within a few seconds after recording and transmission a preliminary report is available in printed format. The transmitted Ecgs are stored at the central computer and are being retrieved and evaluated manually there. Three cardiologists read the tracings and furnished final reports. 468 Ecgs were thus compared in our test time of 10 days for statistical evaluation with the following results: 1. 73.1% of all statements were read correctly by the computer. 2. There is a large range of diagnostic accuracy between 0% and 100%. 3. The evaluation of Ecg changed by cardiologists reflects the individual experience of the controllers regarding the Ecg statements as well as computer-dependent possibilities like modification etc. of Ecg. 4. As an example the diagnosis "myocardial infarction" is compared with other Ecg computer programs by means of a quality index calculated from sensitivity and specificity: HP 5 with 158.5 points reaches a similar level as the Pipberger program with 162.6 and the Bonner with 159.5 points. 5. Referring to false negative results this program is acceptable in all diagnostic groups with ca. 8%, except conduction defects with 17.7%. 6. Referring to false positive results the diagnostic groups myocardial infarction/ischemia and conduction defects are not satisfactory with 36.5% and 23.4%. 7. In all the tested system seems to be very useful in routine Ecg interpretation of bigger hospitals.
在四个月的时间里,对一个由中央计算机和两个外围设备组成的全自动心电图记录与解读系统(惠普HP 5)进行了评估。心电图通过公共电话线传输,中央站的报告也传输到外围记录和打印单元。在记录和传输后的几秒钟内,就能获得打印格式的初步报告。传输来的心电图存储在中央计算机中,并在那里进行人工检索和评估。三位心脏病专家阅读这些心电图并提供最终报告。在我们为期10天的测试时间里,共比较了468份心电图以进行统计评估,结果如下:1. 计算机正确解读了所有陈述的73.1%。2. 诊断准确率在0%至100%之间有很大差异。3. 心脏病专家对心电图的评估反映了控制人员在心电图陈述方面的个人经验以及与计算机相关的可能性,如心电图的修改等。4. 例如,通过根据敏感性和特异性计算的质量指数,将“心肌梗死”的诊断与其他心电图计算机程序进行比较:惠普5得158.5分,与皮普伯格程序的162.6分以及邦纳程序的159.5分达到相似水平。5. 对于假阴性结果,除传导缺陷为17.7%外,该程序在所有诊断组中约8%的情况下是可接受的。6. 对于假阳性结果,心肌梗死/缺血和传导缺陷诊断组的情况不太令人满意,分别为36.5%和23.4%。7. 在所有测试中,该系统在大型医院的常规心电图解读中似乎非常有用。