Suppr超能文献

跟骨滑动截骨术固定类型:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

Types of Sliding Calcaneal Osteotomy Fixation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Hakeem Samir, Elbardecy Hany, Alnajjar Rafee, Mohammed Wafi, McLeod Andre

机构信息

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Galway University Hospital, Galway, IRL.

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Cork University Hospital, Cork, IRL.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 Dec 21;14(12):e32795. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32795. eCollection 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction Different methods are used to fix a sliding calcaneal osteotomy for hindfoot varus and valgus deformity. However, information about the effectiveness and limitations of each method is limited. In this meta-analysis, we compare the hardware removal rate, union rate, and complications of three different methods of fixation: plate, headed screw, and headless screw. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis of published articles were carried out, following the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. We investigated diverse databases, Web of Science, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), to search articles reporting the use of different calcaneal osteotomy fixations from database inception to October 2021. The primary outcome was the hardware removal rate, and the secondary outcomes of interest were the union rate and complications. Results Of 1,903 articles identified, eight met the inclusion criteria. The highest risk ratio (RR) of the hardware removal rate was detected in the headed screw method (RR: 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.26-0.58). However, the highest RR of nonunion was detected in the plate method (RR: 0.02, 95%CI: 0.01-0.07). Regarding complications (infections), the headed screw method presented the highest RR of infection (RR: 0.24, 95%CI: 0.06-0.97). Conclusion This comprehensive review and meta-analysis revealed that the headless screw method may be the most effective fixation option for calcaneal osteotomy with the lowest risk of hardware removal rate, nonunion rate, and complications. Obviously, further studies are needed on a larger number of patients to confirm this finding.

摘要

引言 对于后足内翻和外翻畸形,采用不同方法固定跟骨滑动截骨术。然而,每种方法的有效性和局限性的相关信息有限。在这项荟萃分析中,我们比较了三种不同固定方法(钢板、有头螺钉和无头螺钉)的内固定取出率、愈合率及并发症。

方法 按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南的建议,对已发表文章进行系统评价和荟萃分析。我们检索了多个数据库,包括科学网、PubMed、考克兰图书馆、医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)以及护理与联合健康文献累积索引(CINAHL),以查找从数据库建立至2021年10月期间报告使用不同跟骨截骨固定方法的文章。主要结局是内固定取出率,感兴趣的次要结局是愈合率和并发症。

结果 在检索到的1903篇文章中,8篇符合纳入标准。有头螺钉固定方法的内固定取出率风险比(RR)最高(RR:0.39,95%置信区间(CI):0.26 - 0.58)。然而,钢板固定方法的不愈合RR最高(RR:0.02,95%CI:0.01 - 0.07)。关于并发症(感染),有头螺钉固定方法的感染RR最高(RR:0.24,95%CI:0.06 - 0.97)。

结论 这项全面的综述和荟萃分析表明,无头螺钉固定方法可能是跟骨截骨最有效的固定选择,其在内固定取出率、不愈合率和并发症方面风险最低。显然,需要对更多患者进行进一步研究以证实这一发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/691a/9858884/aba9c3aadf06/cureus-0014-00000032795-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验