Carrera Jennifer S, Key Kent
Department of Sociology and Environmental Science & Policy Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
Community Engaged Research and Health Disparities Researcher, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Flint, Michigan.
WIREs Water. 2021 Jul-Aug;8(4). doi: 10.1002/wat2.1524. Epub 2021 Mar 28.
While the story of the Flint water crisis has been shared widely, the popular narrative-described in multiple documentaries and as evidenced by accolades heaped upon a limited few number of actors involved with Flint-largely leaves out the broad experiences and actions of Flint residents in responding to the crisis, raising awareness, and advocating for change. Academic literature has contributed to reinforcing an abbreviated and disempowered version of the narrative where Flint residents needed rescue. In this article, we present an extended description of the Flint water crisis leading up to the water switch in April 2014, including descriptions of community mobilization efforts to call government actions into account and produce investigations that validated the concerns of the residents. We offer a review of prominent academic literature demonstrating patterns of erasure that suggest Flint residents were disempowered. In response, we offer three examples which demonstrate how Flint resident mobilizations have broad historical context, national reach, and individual actions that contradict the narrative that Flint residents lack agency and power. In our analysis, rather than viewing Flint residents as in need of rescue by science, we argue that the community mobilization in Flint is indicative of a highly successful implementation of popular epidemiology with profound effects on national conversations about lead in water, drinking water infrastructure management, and environmental justice.
虽然弗林特水危机的故事已被广泛传播,但在多部纪录片中呈现且从少数参与弗林特事件的演员所获赞誉可见一斑的流行叙事,在很大程度上忽略了弗林特居民应对危机、提高认识和倡导变革的广泛经历与行动。学术文献也强化了这种简化且使居民无权的叙事版本,即弗林特居民需要救援。在本文中,我们详细描述了2014年4月供水切换之前的弗林特水危机,包括社区动员努力的描述,这些努力促使政府行动受到审视并展开调查,证实了居民的担忧。我们回顾了一些著名学术文献,这些文献呈现出抹去居民力量的模式,表明弗林特居民被剥夺了权力。作为回应,我们给出三个例子,展示弗林特居民的动员如何具有广泛的历史背景、全国影响力以及与弗林特居民缺乏能动性和权力这一叙事相矛盾的个人行动。在我们的分析中,我们认为不应将弗林特居民视为需要科学救援的对象,相反,弗林特的社区动员表明了大众流行病学的高度成功实施,对全国关于水中铅、饮用水基础设施管理和环境正义的讨论产生了深远影响。