评估 4 米步行测试的重测信度和同时效度及其与慢性门诊脑卒中幸存者的 5 次坐-站测试的相关性。

Assessment of the 4-meter walk test test-retest reliability and concurrent validity and its correlation with the five sit-to-stand test in chronic ambulatory stroke survivors.

机构信息

Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Physiotherapy Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sant Cugat del Vallés, Barcelona, Spain.

Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, PhD Program, Sant Cugat del Vallés, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Gait Posture. 2023 Mar;101:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.01.014. Epub 2023 Jan 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 4-meter walk test (4-MWT) is a widely used measure to assess gait speed in the elderly but has not been validated for stroke survivors to date.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the 4-MWT compared to the 10-meter walk test (10-MWT) as a measure of gait speed in chronic post-stroke.

SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURE

to assess the correlation of both gait measures with the 5 times sit-to-stand test (5TSTS).

METHODS

A cross-sectional observational study was conducted. Reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC-95%). Bland & Altman analysis was used to quantify agreement between the 4-MWT and the 10-MWT. Two consecutive walking trials of the 4-MWT and 10-MWT followed by 5TSTS were performed all on the same day. A single researcher made all measurements.

RESULTS

Thirty-six chronic ambulatory post-stroke (average age 58.56 ± 11.28 years) were analyzed at their self-selected walking speed with a dynamic start. The 4-MWT showed excellent concurrent validity and test-retest reliability: ICC = 0.991 (95% CI: 0.983, 0.996); SEM= 0.032 and MDC- 95% = 0.090 m/second) with a strong positive correlation with the 10-MWT (r = 0.957, p < 0.001). The Bland & Altman analysis showed a concordance of -0.05 m/second bias (p = 0.039) (95% limits of agreement: 0.20 to -0.29 m/second). The paired t-test showed no statistically significant difference in the mean of both walking tests (p < 0.091). However, there was only moderate correlation between the two gait assessments and the 5TSTS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates excellent test-retest reliability concurrent validity and strong correlation between 4-MWT and 10-MWT with a dynamic start at comfortable speed. The 4-MWT could be used as a measure of gait speed in both outpatients and home settings in chronic ambulatory stroke survivors.

摘要

背景

4 米步行测试(4-MWT)是一种广泛用于评估老年人步态速度的方法,但迄今为止尚未针对中风幸存者进行验证。

目的

评估 4-MWT 的重测信度和同时效度,将其作为慢性中风后步态速度的测量方法与 10 米步行测试(10-MWT)进行比较。

次要结果测量

评估两种步态测量方法与 5 次坐-站测试(5TSTS)的相关性。

方法

进行了一项横断面观察性研究。通过组内相关系数(ICC)、测量标准误差(SEM)和最小可检测变化(MDC-95%)评估可靠性。Bland & Altman 分析用于量化 4-MWT 和 10-MWT 之间的一致性。在同一天,对 4-MWT 和 10-MWT 进行两次连续的步行试验,然后进行 5TSTS。由一名研究人员进行所有测量。

结果

对 36 名慢性活动后中风(平均年龄 58.56±11.28 岁)以动态启动方式进行自我选择的步行速度进行分析。4-MWT 显示出极好的同时效度和重测信度:ICC=0.991(95%置信区间:0.983,0.996);SEM=0.032,MDC-95%=0.090 米/秒),与 10-MWT 呈强正相关(r=0.957,p<0.001)。Bland & Altman 分析显示,一致性为-0.05 米/秒的偏差(p=0.039)(95%一致性界限:0.20 至-0.29 米/秒)。配对 t 检验显示两种步行测试的平均值无统计学差异(p<0.091)。然而,两种步态评估与 5TSTS 之间只有中度相关性。

结论

本研究表明,4-MWT 与动态启动舒适速度下的 10-MWT 具有极好的重测信度、同时效度和强相关性。4-MWT 可用于慢性活动后中风幸存者门诊和家庭环境中的步态速度测量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索