Suppr超能文献

运动员孤立性大收肌损伤:病例系列

Isolated Adductor Magnus Injuries in Athletes: A Case Series.

作者信息

Mechó Sandra, Balius Ramon, Bossy Mireia, Valle Xavier, Pedret Carles, Ruiz-Cotorro Ángel, Rodas Gil

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Hospital of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Medical Department, Football Club Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Jan 17;11(1):23259671221138806. doi: 10.1177/23259671221138806. eCollection 2023 Jan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known about injuries to the adductor magnus (AM) muscle and how to manage them.

PURPOSE

To describe the injury mechanisms of the AM and its histoarchitecture, clinical characteristics, and imaging features in elite athletes.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A total of 11 competitive athletes with an AM injury were included in the study. Each case was clinically assessed, and the diagnosis and classification were made by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) according to the British Athletics Muscle Injury Classification (BAMIC) and mechanism, location, grade, and reinjury (MLG-R) classification. A 1-year follow-up was performed, and return-to-play (RTP) time was recorded.

RESULTS

Different mechanisms of injury were found; most of the athletes (10/11) had flexion and internal rotation of the hip with extension or slight flexion of the knee. Symptoms consisted of pain in the posteromedial (7/11) or medial (4/11) thigh during adduction and flexion of the knee. Clinically, there was a suspicion of an injury to the AM in only 3 athletes. According to MRI, 5 lesions were located in the ischiocondylar portion (3 in the proximal and 2 in the distal myoconnective junction) and 6 in the pubofemoral portion (4 in the distal and 2 in the proximal myoconnective junction). Most of the ischiocondylar lesions were myotendinous (3/5), and most of the pubofemoral lesions were myofascial (5/6). The BAMIC and MLG-R classification coincided in distinguishing injuries of moderate and mild severity. The management was nonoperative in all cases. The mean RTP time was 14 days (range, 0-35 days) and was longer in the ischiocondylar cases than in the pubofemoral cases (21 vs 8 days, respectively). Only 1 recurrence, at <10 months, was recorded.

CONCLUSION

Posteromedial thigh pain after an eccentric contraction during forced adduction of the thigh from hip internal rotation should raise a suspicion of AM lesions. The identification of the affected portion was possible on MRI. An injury in the ischiocondylar portion entailed a longer RTP time than an injury in the pubofemoral portion.

摘要

背景

关于大收肌(AM)损伤及其处理方法,人们了解甚少。

目的

描述精英运动员中AM的损伤机制、组织结构、临床特征及影像学特征。

研究设计

病例系列;证据等级,4级。

方法

本研究共纳入11名患有AM损伤的竞技运动员。对每个病例进行临床评估,并根据英国田径肌肉损伤分类(BAMIC)以及损伤机制、部位、等级和再损伤(MLG-R)分类,通过磁共振成像(MRI)进行诊断和分类。进行为期1年的随访,并记录重返比赛(RTP)时间。

结果

发现了不同的损伤机制;大多数运动员(10/11)在髋关节屈曲和内旋且膝关节伸展或轻度屈曲时受伤。症状包括在膝关节内收和屈曲时大腿后内侧(7/11)或内侧(4/11)疼痛。临床上,只有3名运动员被怀疑有AM损伤。根据MRI检查,5处损伤位于髁间部(近端3处,远端肌连接部2处),6处位于耻骨股部(远端4处,近端肌连接部2处)。大多数髁间部损伤为肌腱肌肉损伤(3/5),大多数耻骨股部损伤为肌筋膜损伤(5/6)。BAMIC和MLG-R分类在区分中度和轻度损伤方面是一致的。所有病例均采用非手术治疗。平均RTP时间为14天(范围0 - 35天),髁间部损伤的运动员比耻骨股部损伤的运动员RTP时间更长(分别为21天和8天)。仅记录到1例在10个月内复发的病例。

结论

在大腿从髋关节内旋进行强迫内收时发生离心收缩后出现大腿后内侧疼痛,应怀疑有AM损伤。通过MRI可以确定受影响的部位。髁间部损伤的RTP时间比耻骨股部损伤的更长。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8f8/9869219/365fba9072f6/10.1177_23259671221138806-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验