Garcia Marianne Rica, Iribarren Iñigo, Rozas Isabel, Trujillo Cristina
School of Chemistry, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, 154-160 Pearse Street, D02 R590, Dublin, Ireland.
Department of Chemistry, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, M13 9PL, Manchester, UK.
Chemistry. 2023 Apr 13;29(21):e202203577. doi: 10.1002/chem.202203577. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
This computational work studies the different hydrogen bond (HB) binding modes that can be established between neighbouring HB donors and acceptors in structures with relevance in catalysis and biology. To analyse the electronic effect on the σ-hole, unsubstituted HB donors and ones with two different substituents, an electron withdrawing (EWG), and an electron donating (EDG) group, were studied. Upon complexation, three different binding modes were observed: bifurcated, parallel, and zigzag. It was found that, as a general trend, HBs within a parallel pattern are the strongest followed by those within bifurcated and zigzag binding modes, leading to a "competition" between the last two. Similar patterns and trends have been found in experimental structures found in a search within the CSD. In conclusion, even though the HB acceptors "rule" the pattern and strength of the HB interactions within the dimers, when there is an option for different binding modes within a particular dimer, the HB donors "choose" the type of binding established.
这项计算工作研究了在与催化和生物学相关的结构中,相邻氢键供体和受体之间可以建立的不同氢键(HB)结合模式。为了分析对σ-空穴的电子效应,研究了未取代的氢键供体以及带有两个不同取代基(一个吸电子基团(EWG)和一个供电子基团(EDG))的氢键供体。在络合过程中,观察到三种不同的结合模式:分叉、平行和锯齿形。结果发现,一般趋势是,平行模式内的氢键最强,其次是分叉和锯齿形结合模式内的氢键,导致后两者之间存在“竞争”。在对剑桥晶体结构数据库(CSD)搜索得到的实验结构中也发现了类似的模式和趋势。总之,尽管氢键受体“决定”了二聚体内氢键相互作用的模式和强度,但当特定二聚体内存在不同结合模式的选择时,氢键供体“选择”所建立的结合类型。