Suppr超能文献

通过唾液和鼻咽拭子对一线医护人员进行 SARS-CoV-2 感染检测:一项观察性队列研究。

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection by saliva and nasopharyngeal sampling in frontline healthcare workers: An observational cohort study.

机构信息

Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Tropical and Infectious Diseases Unit, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Jan 27;18(1):e0280908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280908. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has caused an unprecedented strain on healthcare systems worldwide, including the United Kingdom National Health Service (NHS). We conducted an observational cohort study of SARS-CoV-2 infection in frontline healthcare workers (HCW) working in an acute NHS Trust during the first wave of the pandemic, to answer emerging questions surrounding SARS-CoV-2 infection, diagnosis, transmission and control.

METHODS

Using self-collected weekly saliva and twice weekly combined oropharyngeal/nasopharyngeal (OP/NP) samples, in addition to self-assessed symptom profiles and isolation behaviours, we retrospectively compared SARS-CoV-2 detection by RT-qPCR of saliva and OP/NP samples. We report the association with contemporaneous symptoms and isolation behaviour.

RESULTS

Over a 12-week period from 30th March 2020, 40·0% (n = 34/85, 95% confidence interval 31·3-51·8%) HCW had evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection by surveillance OP/NP swab and/or saliva sample. Symptoms were reported by 47·1% (n = 40) and self-isolation by 25·9% (n = 22) participants. Only 44.1% (n = 15/34) participants with SARS-CoV-2 infection reported any symptoms within 14 days of a positive result and only 29·4% (n = 10/34) reported self-isolation periods. Overall agreement between paired saliva and OP/NP swabs was 93·4% (n = 211/226 pairs) but rates of positive concordance were low. In paired samples with at least one positive result, 35·0% (n = 7/20) were positive exclusively by OP/NP swab, 40·0% (n = 8/20) exclusively by saliva and in only 25·0% (n = 5/20) were the OP/NP and saliva result both positive.

CONCLUSIONS

HCW are a potential source of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in hospitals and symptom screening will identify the minority of infections. Without routine asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 screening, it is likely that HCW with SARS-CoV-2 infection would continue to attend work. Saliva, in addition to OP/NP swab testing, facilitated ascertainment of symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections. Combined saliva and OP/NP swab sampling would improve detection of SARS-CoV-2 for surveillance and is recommended for a high sensitivity strategy.

摘要

背景

SARS-CoV-2 大流行给全球医疗保健系统带来了前所未有的压力,包括英国国民保健制度(NHS)。我们对在大流行第一波期间在一家 NHS 信托机构工作的一线医护人员(HCW)中进行了 SARS-CoV-2 感染的观察性队列研究,以回答有关 SARS-CoV-2 感染、诊断、传播和控制的新出现问题。

方法

使用每周自我收集的唾液和每两周一次的联合鼻咽/口咽(OP/NP)样本,以及自我评估的症状特征和隔离行为,我们回顾性比较了 RT-qPCR 检测唾液和 OP/NP 样本中的 SARS-CoV-2 检测。我们报告了与同期症状和隔离行为的关联。

结果

从 2020 年 3 月 30 日开始的 12 周内,40.0%(n=34/85,95%置信区间 31.3-51.8%)的 HCW 通过监测 OP/NP 拭子和/或唾液样本检测到 SARS-CoV-2 感染。47.1%(n=40)报告有症状,25.9%(n=22)的参与者自我隔离。只有 44.1%(n=15/34)有 SARS-CoV-2 感染的参与者在阳性结果后 14 天内报告了任何症状,只有 29.4%(n=10/34)报告了自我隔离期。配对唾液和 OP/NP 拭子之间的总一致性为 93.4%(n=211/226 对),但阳性一致性率较低。在至少有一个阳性结果的配对样本中,35.0%(n=7/20)仅通过 OP/NP 拭子检测呈阳性,40.0%(n=8/20)仅通过唾液检测呈阳性,仅 25.0%(n=5/20)的 OP/NP 和唾液结果均为阳性。

结论

HCW 是医院中 SARS-CoV-2 传播的潜在来源,症状筛查将确定少数感染病例。如果不进行常规无症状 SARS-CoV-2 筛查,那么感染 SARS-CoV-2 的 HCW 可能会继续上班。除了 OP/NP 拭子检测外,唾液还可用于确定有症状和无症状的 SARS-CoV-2 感染。联合唾液和 OP/NP 拭子采样可提高 SARS-CoV-2 的检测灵敏度,用于监测,并建议采用高灵敏度策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35ab/9882898/cc3ec847719e/pone.0280908.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验