Loo Sun, Lim Andrew, Lee Sze Ting, Grigg Andrew
Department of Clinical Haematology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Clinical Haematology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2023 Mar;23(3):e190-e194. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2022.11.010. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
In patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma after first line therapy, chemosensitivity to salvage chemotherapy is the main determinant of outcome pre-autologous stem cell transplant . With novel therapies not yet widely available and poor responses to conventional dose salvage therapy such as ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE) in patients with early relapse within 12 months and primary refractory disease, there is capacity to dose intensify ifosfamide and etoposide (augmented ICE).
We retrospectively evaluated patients who received augmented ICE between 2010 and 2020 and report on response, deliverability, toxicities, and outcome. Patients were transplant eligible with diffuse large-B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) with refractory disease or relapse within 12 months. Dose of augmented ICE versus standard ICE was ifosfamide 10 versus 5 g/m and etoposide 600 versus 300 mg/m. Carboplatin dose with a calculated area under curve of 5 was unchanged. Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody was given in patients with CD20 positive lymphoma. Responding patients who achieved complete response or partial response proceeded to transplant.
Twenty-one patients with DLBCL (n = 13) and HL (n = 8) received augmented ICE. Nineteen of 21 completed 2 cycles. Overall response rates were 85% (DLBCL) and 100% (HL). Most patients required transfusion, 2 developed reversible ifosfamide encephalopathy and 86% febrile neutropenia. Eighteen patients proceeded to transplant. 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in DLBCL were 62% and 45%, and in HL, 100% and 88%, respectively.
Augmented ICE is associated with high response rate and transplant realization at the expense of toxicity.
在一线治疗后复发/难治性淋巴瘤患者中,挽救性化疗的化疗敏感性是自体干细胞移植前预后的主要决定因素。由于新疗法尚未广泛应用,且对于12个月内早期复发和原发性难治性疾病患者,对常规剂量挽救性化疗(如异环磷酰胺、卡铂和依托泊苷(ICE))反应不佳,因此有增加异环磷酰胺和依托泊苷剂量(强化ICE)的可能性。
我们回顾性评估了2010年至2020年间接受强化ICE治疗的患者,并报告了反应、可行性、毒性和预后情况。患者符合移植条件,患有弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)或霍奇金淋巴瘤(HL),疾病难治或在12个月内复发。强化ICE与标准ICE的剂量相比,异环磷酰胺为10 g/m² 对比5 g/m²,依托泊苷为600 mg/m² 对比300 mg/m²。计算曲线下面积为5的卡铂剂量不变。CD20阳性淋巴瘤患者给予抗CD20单克隆抗体。达到完全缓解或部分缓解的反应性患者继续进行移植。
21例DLBCL患者(n = 13)和HL患者(n = 8)接受了强化ICE治疗。21例中有19例完成了2个周期。总体缓解率分别为85%(DLBCL)和100%(HL)。大多数患者需要输血,2例出现可逆性异环磷酰胺脑病,86%出现发热性中性粒细胞减少。18例患者继续进行移植。DLBCL患者的5年总生存率(OS)和无进展生存率(PFS)分别为62%和45%,HL患者分别为100%和88%。
强化ICE与高缓解率和移植成功率相关,但代价是毒性较大。