Knezevic Aleksandar, Kovacevic Milena, Jeremic-Knezevic Milica, Nikolasevic Zeljka, Tomasevic-Todorovic Snezana, Zivanovic Zeljko, Spasojevic Tijana, Garipi Enis, Vojnovic Larisa, Popovic Dunja, Neblett Randy
Faculty of Medicine University of Novi Sad, Serbia; Medical Rehabilitation Clinic University Clinical Centre of Vojvodina, Serbia.
Faculty of Medicine University of Novi Sad, Serbia.
Neurophysiol Clin. 2023 Aug;53(4):102841. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2022.102841. Epub 2023 Jan 28.
The purpose of the study was to evaluate pain thresholds, impairment of the endogenous pain modulatory system, and self-reported cognitive-emotional and central sensitization-related symptoms among three subject groups: a rarely studied patient cohort with neuropathic pain from lumbosacral radiculopathy (NPLSR), patients with fibromyalgia (FM) and healthy controls (HC).
Patient-reported pain-related symptomology was evaluated with psychometricallyvalidated questionnaires. Pressure pain threshold (PPT), heat pain threshold (HPT), and cold pain threshold (CPT) were assessed in the low back and contralateral forearm. Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) was evaluated with a recently introduced methodology that accounts for a standard error of measurement.
Compared to the HC subjects, the FM and NPLSR subjects had significantly lower pain thresholds and more CPM impairment. No significant differences in PPT and CPM were observed between the FM and NPLSR groups. Significant group differences were found in self-reported symptoms of depression, anxiety, stress, and central sensitization. Self-reported symptom severity increased in a stair-step fashion, with the HC group scoring lowest and FM group scoring highest.
The NPLSR group manifested CPM dysfunction and pressure hyperalgesia at similar levels to the FM group, indicating that these two chronic pain syndromes, likely based on different pathophysiological mechanisms, in fact share some common pain processing features. However, though both patient groups demonstrated similarities in pain processing, self-reported cognitive-emotional and central sensitization-related symptom severity was significantly higher in the FM cohort, which distinguished them from the chronic NPLSR cohort.
本研究旨在评估三个受试者组的疼痛阈值、内源性疼痛调节系统的损伤以及自我报告的认知-情绪和中枢敏化相关症状,这三个组分别是:一个研究较少的患有腰骶神经根病性神经病理性疼痛的患者队列(NPLSR)、纤维肌痛(FM)患者和健康对照(HC)。
使用经过心理测量验证的问卷评估患者报告的疼痛相关症状。在腰部和对侧前臂评估压力疼痛阈值(PPT)、热痛阈值(HPT)和冷痛阈值(CPT)。采用一种新引入的考虑测量标准误差的方法评估条件性疼痛调制(CPM)。
与HC受试者相比,FM和NPLSR受试者的疼痛阈值显著更低,CPM损伤更严重。FM组和NPLSR组之间在PPT和CPM方面未观察到显著差异。在自我报告的抑郁、焦虑、压力和中枢敏化症状方面发现了显著的组间差异。自我报告的症状严重程度呈阶梯式增加,HC组得分最低,FM组得分最高。
NPLSR组表现出与FM组相似程度的CPM功能障碍和压力痛觉过敏,表明这两种慢性疼痛综合征可能基于不同的病理生理机制,但实际上具有一些共同的疼痛处理特征。然而,尽管两个患者组在疼痛处理方面表现出相似性,但FM队列中自我报告的认知-情绪和中枢敏化相关症状严重程度显著更高,这使它们有别于慢性NPLSR队列。