• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脓毒性休克患者转入重症监护病房时间与结局的影响:一项观察性研究。

Impact of time of intensive care unit transfer and outcomes in patients with septic shock: An observational study.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Gold Coast University Hospital and Health Service, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Emerg Med Australas. 2023 Aug;35(4):612-617. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.14175. Epub 2023 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1111/1742-6723.14175
PMID:36718053
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between time from ED presentation to intensive care unit (ICU) transfer on mortality in patients presenting with septic shock.

METHODS

Adult patients with suspected septic shock enrolled in the Australasian Resuscitation in Sepsis Evaluation trial were included. The primary outcome of this post-hoc analysis was 90-day mortality. ED-to-ICU time was analysed as both a continuous variable and a binary variable (≤ vs >4 h). Analysis incorporated mixed effects regression, with ICU site as a random effect, time-to-event analysis and competing risks regression; all with and without inverse probability of treatment weighting to account for confounding baseline covariates.

RESULTS

Data from 1301 patients were included. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) ED-to-ICU time was 4.3 (3.1, 6.3) hours, with 588 patients (45%) transferred within 4 h. The ≤4-h group were younger, 64 (51, 74) versus 67 (52, 76) years (P = 0.04), with higher APACHE III scores, 50 (37, 65) versus 47 (35, 62) (P = 0.002), and higher unadjusted 90-day mortality, odds ratio (OR) 1.53 (95% confidence interval 1.15, 2.03), P = 0.01. After adjustment for pre-specified confounders, the 90-day mortality OR was 1.09 (0.83, 1.44), P = 0.52. Adjusted for death as a competing event and illness severity, hospital length of stay was similar between groups, whereas ICU duration remained longer for the ≤4-h group.

CONCLUSION

In patients presenting to the ED with septic shock, ED-to-ICU time less than 4 h was not associated with altered 90-day mortality, although this should be interpreted with caution due to study limitations.

摘要

目的

评估从急诊科(ED)转入重症监护病房(ICU)的时间与败血症休克患者死亡率之间的关联。

方法

纳入参与澳大利亚复苏中脓毒症评估试验的疑似败血症休克的成年患者。本事后分析的主要结局为 90 天死亡率。ED 至 ICU 时间既作为连续变量,也作为二分类变量(≤4 小时 vs >4 小时)进行分析。分析采用混合效应回归模型,将 ICU 地点作为随机效应,时间事件分析和竞争风险回归;所有分析均包含了倾向评分逆概率加权法以校正混杂的基线协变量。

结果

共纳入 1301 例患者的数据。中位数(四分位距 [IQR])ED 至 ICU 时间为 4.3(3.1,6.3)小时,588 例患者(45%)在 4 小时内转入 ICU。≤4 小时组患者年龄更小,64(51,74)岁 vs 67(52,76)岁(P=0.04),急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统 III 评分更高,50(37,65)分 vs 47(35,62)分(P=0.002),未校正的 90 天死亡率更高,比值比(OR)为 1.53(95%置信区间 1.15,2.03),P=0.01。在校正了预先指定的混杂因素后,90 天死亡率的 OR 为 1.09(0.83,1.44),P=0.52。在调整死亡作为竞争事件和疾病严重程度后,两组患者的住院时间相似,而≤4 小时组 ICU 持续时间仍较长。

结论

在因败血症休克而就诊急诊科的患者中,ED 至 ICU 的时间少于 4 小时与 90 天死亡率的改变无关,但是由于研究局限性,应谨慎解释此结果。

相似文献

1
Impact of time of intensive care unit transfer and outcomes in patients with septic shock: An observational study.脓毒性休克患者转入重症监护病房时间与结局的影响:一项观察性研究。
Emerg Med Australas. 2023 Aug;35(4):612-617. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.14175. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
2
Mechanical ventilation and acute lung injury in emergency department patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: an observational study.机械通气与严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克急诊科患者的急性肺损伤:一项观察性研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jul;20(7):659-69. doi: 10.1111/acem.12167.
3
Time Spent in the Emergency Department and Outcomes in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者在急诊科的停留时间及预后
Adv Emerg Nurs J. 2018 Apr/Jun;40(2):94-103. doi: 10.1097/TME.0000000000000188.
4
A combination of early warning score and lactate to predict intensive care unit transfer of inpatients with severe sepsis/septic shock.早期预警评分与乳酸相结合以预测严重脓毒症/脓毒性休克住院患者转入重症监护病房的情况。
Korean J Intern Med. 2015 Jul;30(4):471-7. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2015.30.4.471. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
5
Implementing a collaborative protocol in a sepsis intervention program: lessons learned.在脓毒症干预项目中实施协作方案:经验教训。
Lung. 2011 Feb;189(1):11-9. doi: 10.1007/s00408-010-9266-z. Epub 2010 Nov 16.
6
The outcome of patients with sepsis and septic shock presenting to emergency departments in Australia and New Zealand.在澳大利亚和新西兰的急诊科就诊的脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的治疗结果。
Crit Care Resusc. 2007 Mar;9(1):8-18.
7
Incidence, Risk Factors, and Attributable Mortality of Secondary Infections in the Intensive Care Unit After Admission for Sepsis.入住 ICU 后脓毒症继发感染的发生率、危险因素和归因死亡率。
JAMA. 2016 Apr 12;315(14):1469-79. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.2691.
8
[Predictive value of glycemic variability within 6 hours on the short-term prognosis of patients with septic shock].[脓毒性休克患者6小时内血糖变异性对短期预后的预测价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Jan;33(1):28-32. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200410-00274.
9
Septic shock: an analysis of outcomes for patients with onset on hospital wards versus intensive care units.感染性休克:对在医院病房与重症监护病房发病的患者的结局分析。
Crit Care Med. 1998 Jun;26(6):1020-4. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199806000-00019.
10
Arriving by emergency medical services improves time to treatment endpoints for patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.通过紧急医疗服务到达可改善严重脓毒症或感染性休克患者的治疗终点时间。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Sep;18(9):934-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01145.x. Epub 2011 Aug 30.