From the Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine.
Department of Emergency Medicine.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2023 Feb 1;39(2):87-90. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002894. Epub 2023 Jan 8.
Dog bites occur frequently in the United States, yet there are no clear guidelines for prescribing antibiotic prophylaxis in healthy children after a dog bite. The aim of our study was to assess antibiotic prophylaxis and subsequent rates of infection after dog bites in children. We hypothesized a negative association between prophylactic prescription of any antimicrobial and return visit within 14 days for infection.
In this retrospective cohort study, we assessed the frequency of antibiotic prophylaxis prescribed after dog bite injuries in patients 0 to 18 years old and subsequent return visits for infection using 2016 to 2017 medical and pharmacy claims derived from the IBM MarketScan Research Databases. We used the International Classification of Diseases-10 code W54 for dog bites then used keyword searches to find diagnoses (including infection), wound descriptions, and medications.
Over the 2-year period, 22,911 patients were seen for dog bites that were not coded as infected. The majority, 13,043 (56.9%), were prescribed an antibiotic at the initial visit and 9868 (43.1%) were not. Of those prescribed antibiotics, 98 (0.75%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.90) returned with an infection, compared with 59 (0.60%; 95% CI, 0.44-0.75) of those not prescribed antibiotics. Receiving an antibiotic prescription at the initial visit was associated with a reduced rate of return for wound infection only among children whose wounds were repaired or closed. Children not receiving a prescription whose wounds were repaired were more than twice as likely to return with an infection in the subsequent 14 days as children whose wounds were not repaired (odds ratio, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2-4.0).
Most children are prescribed antibiotics at an initial emergency department visit after a dog bite. However, very few return for infection independent of antimicrobial prophylaxis, which suggests antibiotics are overprescribed in this setting.
狗咬伤在美国很常见,但对于健康儿童被狗咬伤后是否应预防性使用抗生素,目前尚无明确的指南。本研究旨在评估儿童狗咬伤后抗生素预防的应用情况和随后的感染率。我们假设任何抗菌药物预防性应用与 14 天内因感染而复诊之间呈负相关。
本回顾性队列研究对 2016 年至 2017 年 IBM MarketScan 研究数据库中的医疗和药房记录进行分析,评估了 0 至 18 岁因狗咬伤就诊的患者中抗生素预防应用的频率,以及随后因感染而复诊的频率。我们使用国际疾病分类第 10 版(ICD-10)编码 W54 来识别狗咬伤,然后使用关键词搜索来寻找诊断(包括感染)、伤口描述和药物信息。
在 2 年期间,共有 22911 例患者因未感染的狗咬伤就诊。大多数患者(13043 例,占 56.9%)在首次就诊时开了抗生素,9868 例(占 43.1%)未开抗生素。在开了抗生素的患者中,有 98 例(0.75%;95%置信区间[CI],0.60%-0.90%)因感染而复诊,而未开抗生素的患者中则有 59 例(0.60%;95%CI,0.44%-0.75%)。在接受初始就诊抗生素治疗的患者中,仅当伤口需要修复或缝合时,抗生素治疗与伤口感染的复诊率降低相关。未接受处方治疗但伤口需要修复的患者在随后的 14 天内感染的可能性是伤口未修复患者的两倍多(比值比,2.2;95%CI,1.2-4.0)。
大多数儿童在因狗咬伤首次就诊时会被开抗生素。然而,很少有患者因感染而复诊,这表明在这种情况下抗生素的应用存在过度现象。