Department of Gender and Women's Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Stud Fam Plann. 2023 Mar;54(1):201-230. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12224. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
There is growing consensus in the family planning community around the need for novel measures of autonomy. Existing literature highlights the tension between efforts to pursue contraceptive targets and maximize uptake on the one hand, and efforts to promote quality, person-centeredness, and contraceptive autonomy on the other hand. Here, we pilot a novel measure of contraceptive autonomy, measuring it at two Health and Demographic Surveillance System sites in Burkina Faso. We conducted a population-based survey with 3,929 women of reproductive age, testing an array of new survey items within the three subdomains of informed choice, full choice, and free choice. In addition to providing tentative estimates of the prevalence of contraceptive autonomy and its subdomains in our sample of Burkinabè women, we critically examine which parts of the proposed methodology worked well, what challenges/limitations we encountered, and what next steps might be for refining, improving, and validating the indicator. We demonstrate that contraceptive autonomy can be measured at the population level but a number of complex measurement challenges remain. Rather than a final validated tool, we consider this a step on a long road toward a more person-centered measurement agenda for the global family planning community.
计划生育领域越来越达成共识,认为需要新的自主权衡量标准。现有文献强调了一方面追求避孕目标和最大限度提高采用率,另一方面努力促进质量、以人为中心和避孕自主权之间的紧张关系。在这里,我们在布基纳法索的两个健康和人口监测系统地点试点了一种新的避孕自主权衡量标准。我们对 3929 名育龄妇女进行了一项基于人群的调查,在知情选择、完全选择和自由选择这三个子领域中测试了一系列新的调查项目。除了提供我们在布基纳法索妇女样本中避孕自主权及其子领域的流行率的初步估计外,我们还批判性地审查了所提出的方法学中哪些部分运作良好,我们遇到了哪些挑战/限制,以及下一步可能会对该指标进行细化、改进和验证。我们证明可以在人群层面上衡量避孕自主权,但仍然存在许多复杂的衡量挑战。我们认为这不是一个最终经过验证的工具,而是朝着更以人为中心的全球计划生育界衡量议程迈出的漫长道路上的一步。