Suppr超能文献

静脉与神经周围给予右美托咪定作为股神经阻滞在全膝关节置换术中的辅助用药。

Intravenous versus perineural dexmedetomidine as adjuvant in adductor canal block for total knee arthroplasty.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Al Mansurah, Egypt.

出版信息

Korean J Anesthesiol. 2023 Aug;76(4):307-316. doi: 10.4097/kja.22579. Epub 2023 Feb 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The shivering effect after spinal anesthesia in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is challenging for anesthesiologists. This study aimed to compare two administration routes of dexmedetomidine as a post-neuraxial shivering prevention measure and an adjunctive analgesic and sedative agent.

METHODS

Fifty-six patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups. The intravenous dexmedetomidine (IV dex) group received an IV infusion of 0.5 µg/kg dexmedetomidine diluted in 20 ml saline and an adductor canal block (ACB) consisting of 20 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine and 1 ml saline. The adductor canal block dexmedetomidine (ACB dex) group received a 20 ml IV infusion of saline and an ACB consisting of 20 ml 0.25% levobupivacaine and 1 ml of 0.5 µg/kg dexmedetomidine.

RESULTS

The incidence of shivering 1 h post spinal anesthesia was equal in both groups (50%); however, the shivering grade was significantly lower in the IV dex group 1 h postoperatively. The onset of sensory block was significantly later in the IV dex group (22.14 ± 2.52 min) than in the ACB dex group (12 ± 3.31 min). Postoperative analgesic duration (h) was significantly longer in the ACB dex group (12.28 ± 4.47) compared to the IV dex group (9.28 ± 1.90). The sedation scores were also significantly higher in the IV dex group in the preoperative, intraoperative, and immediate postoperative periods.

CONCLUSIONS

While perineural ACB dexmedetomidine had similar intraoperative anti-shivering with less sedative effects as IV dexmedetomidine, it was associated with both less shivering control and superior analgesia post-TKA under spinal anesthesia.

摘要

背景

全膝关节置换术后椎管内麻醉后寒战是麻醉医师面临的挑战。本研究旨在比较两种右美托咪定给药途径作为预防椎管内神经后寒战的措施以及辅助镇痛和镇静药物。

方法

将 56 名患者随机分为两组。静脉内给予右美托咪定(IV 右美)组接受 0.5μg/kg 右美托咪定稀释在 20ml 生理盐水中的静脉输注和由 20ml 0.25%左旋布比卡因和 1ml 生理盐水组成的收肌管阻滞(ACB)。收肌管内给予右美托咪定(ACB 右美)组接受 20ml 生理盐水静脉输注和由 20ml 0.25%左旋布比卡因和 1ml 0.5μg/kg 右美托咪定组成的 ACB。

结果

椎管麻醉后 1 小时两组寒战发生率相同(50%);然而,IV 右美组术后 1 小时寒战程度明显较低。IV 右美组感觉阻滞的起始时间明显较迟(22.14±2.52 分钟),ACB 右美组(12±3.31 分钟)。ACB 右美组术后镇痛时间(小时)明显较长(12.28±4.47),IV 右美组(9.28±1.90)。IV 右美组术前、术中、术后即刻镇静评分也明显较高。

结论

尽管外周神经 ACB 右美托咪定具有与 IV 右美托咪定相似的术中抗寒战作用,且镇静作用较小,但与 TKA 下椎管麻醉后寒战控制较差和镇痛效果较好有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3df2/10391069/c34c26cafd04/kja-22579f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验