Özgün Gizem, Dolcerocca Antoine
Department of Social Policy, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Department of Sociology, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Front Sociol. 2023 Jan 17;7:969750. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.969750. eCollection 2022.
The 1980s saw a shift in the emphasis of discourse on poverty from production relations to consumption relations, with levels of consumption and purchasing power used to define poverty. Based on this concept, much of the research establishes absolute poverty lines or develops relative indicators to distinguish between "poor" and "non-poor." This paper makes the case that such poverty measurement, while useful for assessing trends over the long term or taking into account relative dynamics, distorts our knowledge of poverty by hiding its root causes and results in overly optimistic interpretations. These discussions also decontextualize poverty from its political and economic context by uncritically accepting and promoting neoliberal regime. Moreover, the article questions the meaning of the "eradication of poverty" and suggests that the nominal rise in PPP income obscures historical capitalist accumulation processes (such as dispossession, proletarianization and depeasantization). As a result, the study suggests to recenter the analysis on the material causes of poverty, which are rooted in the functioning of the capitalist system, its antagonistic character, and the class-based contradictions of production itself.
20世纪80年代,关于贫困的论述重点从生产关系转向了消费关系,消费水平和购买力被用来界定贫困。基于这一概念,许多研究设定了绝对贫困线或制定了相对指标,以区分“贫困”和“非贫困”。本文认为,这种贫困衡量方法虽然有助于评估长期趋势或考虑相对动态,但通过掩盖贫困的根源扭曲了我们对贫困的认识,并导致过于乐观的解读。这些讨论还通过不加批判地接受和推广新自由主义体制,将贫困与其政治和经济背景相脱离。此外,本文对“消除贫困”的含义提出质疑,并指出购买力平价收入的名义增长掩盖了历史上的资本主义积累过程(如剥夺、无产阶级化和农民离乡背井)。因此,该研究建议将分析重点重新放在贫困的物质成因上,这些成因植根于资本主义制度的运行、其对抗性特征以及生产本身基于阶级的矛盾。