• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于识别接受结直肠手术的手术部位感染风险患者的Caresyntax平台的成本效用分析。

Cost-Utility Analysis of the Caresyntax Platform to Identify Patients at Risk of Surgical Site Infection Undergoing Colorectal Surgery.

作者信息

Moloney Eoin, Mashayekhi Atefeh, Javanbakht Mehdi, Hemami Mohsen Rezaei, Branagan-Harris Michael

机构信息

Optimax Access Ltd., Kenneth Dibben House, Enterprise Rd, Chilworth, Southampton Science Park, Southampton, UK.

, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Pharmacoecon Open. 2023 Mar;7(2):285-298. doi: 10.1007/s41669-023-00389-z. Epub 2023 Feb 3.

DOI:10.1007/s41669-023-00389-z
PMID:36737510
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10043121/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infections (SSIs) account for up to 18% of all healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). The Caresyntax data-driven surgery platform incorporates the most common risk factors for SSI, to identify high-risk surgical patients before they leave the operating theatre and treat them prophylactically with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). An economic analysis was performed to assess the costs and health outcomes associated with introduction of the technology in the English healthcare setting.

METHODS

A hybrid decision tree/Markov model was developed to reflect the treatment pathways that patients undergoing colorectal surgery would typically follow, both over the short term (30-day hospital setting) and long term (lifetime). The analysis considered implementation of Caresyntax's platform-based SSI predictive algorithm in the hospital setting, compared with standard of care, from an English National Health Service (NHS) perspective. The base-case analysis presents results in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, as well as operational impact.

RESULTS

The base-case analysis indicates that the intervention leads to a cost saving of £55.52m across the total NHS colorectal surgery patient population in 1 year. In addition, the intervention has a 98.36% probability of being cost effective over a lifetime horizon. The intervention results in the avoidance of 19,744 SSI events, as well 191,911 excess hospital bed days saved.

CONCLUSION

Caresyntax's platform-based SSI predictive algorithm has the potential to result in cost savings and improved patient quality of life. Additionally, operational gains for the healthcare provider, including reduced infection rates and hospital bed days saved, have been shown through the economic modeling.

摘要

背景

手术部位感染(SSIs)占所有医疗相关感染(HAIs)的比例高达18%。Caresyntax数据驱动手术平台纳入了手术部位感染最常见的风险因素,以便在高危手术患者离开手术室前识别出他们,并采用负压伤口治疗(NPWT)进行预防性治疗。开展了一项经济分析,以评估在英国医疗环境中引入该技术所产生的成本和健康结果。

方法

开发了一种混合决策树/马尔可夫模型,以反映结直肠手术患者在短期(30天住院期)和长期(终身)通常会遵循的治疗路径。该分析从英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的角度,考虑了在医院环境中实施Caresyntax基于平台的手术部位感染预测算法,并与标准治疗进行比较。基础案例分析给出了每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的成本结果以及运营影响。

结果

基础案例分析表明,该干预措施在1年内为NHS结直肠手术患者总群体节省了5552万英镑的成本。此外,该干预措施在终身范围内具有成本效益的概率为98.36%。该干预措施避免了19744起手术部位感染事件,还节省了191911个额外的住院日。

结论

Caresyntax基于平台的手术部位感染预测算法有可能节省成本并改善患者生活质量。此外,通过经济建模已表明,该算法能为医疗服务提供者带来运营收益,包括降低感染率和节省住院日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb9d/10043121/a23fe694a8b6/41669_2023_389_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb9d/10043121/9053ebe52dfb/41669_2023_389_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb9d/10043121/f4fa70312d83/41669_2023_389_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb9d/10043121/4666832bfa72/41669_2023_389_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb9d/10043121/a23fe694a8b6/41669_2023_389_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb9d/10043121/9053ebe52dfb/41669_2023_389_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb9d/10043121/f4fa70312d83/41669_2023_389_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb9d/10043121/4666832bfa72/41669_2023_389_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb9d/10043121/a23fe694a8b6/41669_2023_389_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-Utility Analysis of the Caresyntax Platform to Identify Patients at Risk of Surgical Site Infection Undergoing Colorectal Surgery.用于识别接受结直肠手术的手术部位感染风险患者的Caresyntax平台的成本效用分析。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2023 Mar;7(2):285-298. doi: 10.1007/s41669-023-00389-z. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
2
3
Multi-gene Pharmacogenomic Testing That Includes Decision-Support Tools to Guide Medication Selection for Major Depression: A Health Technology Assessment.多基因药物基因组学检测,包括用于指导抗抑郁药物选择的决策支持工具:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2021 Aug 12;21(13):1-214. eCollection 2021.
4
Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.负压伤口疗法在一期缝合手术伤口愈合中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 26;4(4):CD009261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub7.
5
Costs Associated With Surgical Site Infections in Veterans Affairs Hospitals.退伍军人事务医院手术部位感染的相关费用。
JAMA Surg. 2014 Jun;149(6):575-81. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.4663.
6
Surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy: a patient-centered quality of life and health economic evaluation.退行性颈椎脊髓病的手术治疗:以患者为中心的生活质量和健康经济评估。
Spine J. 2017 Jan;17(1):15-25. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.10.015. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
7
Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a pilot study of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy.预防性负压伤口治疗的试点研究及成本效益分析。
J Tissue Viability. 2017 Feb;26(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
8
Cost-effectiveness of incisional negative pressure wound therapy compared with standard care after caesarean section in obese women: a trial-based economic evaluation.剖宫产术后肥胖女性切口负压伤口治疗与标准护理的成本效果比较:基于试验的经济学评价。
BJOG. 2019 Apr;126(5):619-627. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15573. Epub 2018 Dec 29.
9
Three wound-dressing strategies to reduce surgical site infection after abdominal surgery: the Bluebelle feasibility study and pilot RCT.三种减少腹部手术后手术部位感染的伤口处理策略:Bluebelle 可行性研究和初步 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Aug;23(39):1-166. doi: 10.3310/hta23390.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Reducing surgical site infection rates in colorectal surgery - a quality improvement approach to implementing a comprehensive bundle.降低结直肠手术部位感染率——实施综合套件的质量改进方法。
Colorectal Dis. 2021 Nov;23(11):2999-3007. doi: 10.1111/codi.15875. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
2
The impact of surgical site infection on hospitalisation, treatment costs, and health-related quality of life after vascular surgery.血管手术后手术部位感染对住院时间、治疗费用和健康相关生活质量的影响。
Int Wound J. 2021 Jun;18(3):261-268. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13526. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
3
Cost-benefit analysis of surveillance for surgical site infection following caesarean section.
剖宫产术后手术部位感染监测的成本效益分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 20;10(7):e036919. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036919.
4
Willingness to pay for new medicines: a step towards narrowing the gap between NICE and IQWiG.新药支付意愿:弥合 NICE 与 IQWiG 差距的一步。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 22;20(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-5050-9.
5
Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.负压伤口疗法治疗手术部位感染:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019 Nov;25(11):1328-1338. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.06.005. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
6
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Surgical-site Infections: A Randomized Trial.负压伤口疗法治疗手术部位感染:一项随机试验。
Ann Surg. 2019 Jun;269(6):1034-1040. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003056.
7
Interventions and Innovation to Prevent Surgical Site Infection in Colorectal Surgery: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.干预和创新措施预防结直肠手术部位感染:成本效益分析。
J Surg Res. 2019 Mar;235:373-382. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.048. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
8
Health care-associated infections - an overview.医疗保健相关感染——概述
Infect Drug Resist. 2018 Nov 15;11:2321-2333. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S177247. eCollection 2018.
9
Prophylactic closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy is associated with decreased surgical site infection in high-risk colorectal surgery laparotomy wounds.预防性闭合切口负压伤口治疗与高危结直肠手术剖腹伤口的手术部位感染减少有关。
Colorectal Dis. 2019 Jan;21(1):110-118. doi: 10.1111/codi.14350. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
10
Meta-Analysis of Comparative Trials Evaluating a Prophylactic Single-Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System for the Prevention of Surgical Site Complications.评估一次性预防性负压伤口治疗系统预防手术部位并发症的对照试验的Meta分析
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2017 Oct;18(7):810-819. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.156. Epub 2017 Sep 8.