Kumar Praveen, Kamath Veena, Kamath Asha, Bhojani Upendra, Chugh Aastha, Bassi Shalini, Kulkarni Muralidhar M
Department of Commerce, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Department of Community Medicine, Kasturba Medical College (KMC), Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Indian J Community Med. 2022 Oct-Dec;47(4):531-535. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_1491_21. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
Article 5.3 of the World Health Organization's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control necessitates the governments to take measures to protect health policy from the commercial and other vested interests of the tobacco industry (TI). Considering the vast geographical area and diversity between states within India, it is necessary to evaluate the level of implementation of Article 5.3 at the sub-national level. Hence, this study was conducted to assess the implementation of Article 5.3 in the Karnataka state of southern India.
Southeast Asia Tobacco Control Alliance Tobacco Industry Interference index was adopted and used for the study. A desk review was conducted for 2018. Publicly available evidence of tobacco industry interference was scored based on its frequency, severity, and the government's response to it. Lower the score, effective the level of governance against the TI interference, which predicts well for the state.
The study demonstrates a score of 46 out of 95 in the implementation of Article 5.3 in Karnataka, which is lower when compared to the national score of 69 out of 100 for 2018. Corporate social responsibility, conflict of interest, and unnecessary interactions with TI are the major areas that need focus to comply with the provisions of Article 5.3.
Overall, Karnataka needs to strengthen the implementation of Article 5.3 and develop a strategy in line with the global best practices. This assessment can help in identifying areas requiring enhanced vigilance to avoid industry interference.
世界卫生组织《烟草控制框架公约》第5.3条要求各国政府采取措施,保护卫生政策免受烟草行业的商业利益及其他既得利益的影响。考虑到印度地域辽阔且各邦之间存在差异,有必要在次国家层面评估第5.3条的实施水平。因此,本研究旨在评估印度南部卡纳塔克邦第5.3条的实施情况。
本研究采用了东南亚烟草控制联盟烟草行业干预指数。对2018年进行了案头审查。根据烟草行业干预的频率、严重程度以及政府的应对措施,对公开可得的相关证据进行评分。分数越低,表明应对烟草行业干预的治理水平越高,对该邦的预测效果越好。
该研究表明,卡纳塔克邦在实施第5.3条方面的得分为95分中的46分,与2018年全国100分中的69分相比更低。企业社会责任、利益冲突以及与烟草行业的不必要互动是需要重点关注以符合第5.3条规定的主要领域。
总体而言,卡纳塔克邦需要加强第5.3条的实施,并制定符合全球最佳实践的战略。这一评估有助于确定需要加强警惕以避免行业干预的领域。