Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
Br J Ophthalmol. 2024 May 21;108(6):812-817. doi: 10.1136/bjo-2022-322698.
To compare lens extraction (LE) and laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) on anterior segment morphology in primary angle-closure suspect (PACS) eyes.
This prospective clinical trial included 144 patients with PACS who underwent either LPI or LE. Ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) and gonioscopy were performed before and 1 month and 2 years after operation. Main outcomes included UBM parameters and the percentage of residual angle closure.
At both 1 month and 2 years of follow-up, LE showed a better effect of relieving anterior chamber crowding and widening the drainage angle, as obtaining a larger anterior chamber depth (ACD), angle opening distance, trabecular iris angle (TIA), trabecular iris space area, trabecular ciliary process distance (TCPD) and a smaller iris curvature (I-Curv) and lens vault (LV) (p<0.001). In the LPI group, angle width increased (angle opening distance at 500 µm from the scleral spur, TIA and trabecular iris space area at 500 µm from the scleral spur) and I-Curv decreased (p<0.001) at 1 month postoperatively, with no significant changes in ACD, LV or TCPD. However, at 2 years after LPI, the angle narrowed with the increase in LV over time, and the proportion of residual angle closure also increased from 21.7% to 30.4% (p<0.001). In contrast, after LE, the widened angle width, flattened iris, deepened ACD, decreased LV and increased TCPD all showed good sustainability in the comparison between 1-month and 2-year follow-up. No residual angle closure was observed either at 1 month or 2 years after LE.
LE was prior to LPI in widening the drainage angle. After LPI, there was a narrowing of the angle and an increase in the proportion of residual angle closure over time. LE could achieve a wider angle with no residual angle closure, and the anterior segment parameters were sustainable.
ChiCTR1800016511.
比较原发性闭角型青光眼高危人群中行晶状体切除术(LE)与激光周边虹膜切开术(LPI)对眼前节形态的影响。
本前瞻性临床试验纳入了 144 例原发性闭角型青光眼高危人群,他们分别接受了 LPI 或 LE 治疗。在术前及术后 1 个月和 2 年,使用超声生物显微镜(UBM)和房角镜进行检查。主要观察指标包括 UBM 参数和残余房角关闭的百分比。
在术后 1 个月和 2 年随访时,LE 组在缓解前房拥挤和扩大房角方面效果更好,表现为前房深度(ACD)、房角开放距离(AOD)、小梁虹膜角度(TIA)、小梁虹膜空间面积(TISA)、小梁睫状体距离(TCPD)增加,虹膜曲率(I-Curv)和晶状体拱高(LV)减小(p<0.001)。在 LPI 组中,术后 1 个月时,巩膜突 500µm 处的房角宽度增加(AOD500、TIA500 和 TISA500),I-Curv 减小(p<0.001),而 ACD 和 LV 或 TCPD 无明显变化。然而,在 LPI 术后 2 年时,随着 LV 的增加,房角变窄,残余房角关闭的比例也从 21.7%增加到 30.4%(p<0.001)。相比之下,LE 术后,扩大的房角宽度、变平的虹膜、加深的 ACD、减小的 LV 和增加的 TCPD 在 1 个月和 2 年随访时的比较中均表现出良好的可持续性。LE 术后 1 个月和 2 年均未见残余房角关闭。
与 LPI 相比,LE 更有利于扩大房角。LPI 后,随着时间的推移,房角变窄,残余房角关闭的比例增加。LE 可以实现更宽的房角而无残余房角关闭,并且前节参数可持续。
ChiCTR1800016511。