Suppr超能文献

白内障小切口摘除术与激光周边虹膜切开术对原发性闭角型青光眼疑似眼前房形态长期影响的比较。

Long-term effects of mild cataract extraction versus laser peripheral iridotomy on anterior chamber morphology in primary angle-closure suspect eyes.

机构信息

Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA

出版信息

Br J Ophthalmol. 2024 May 21;108(6):812-817. doi: 10.1136/bjo-2022-322698.

Abstract

AIM

To compare lens extraction (LE) and laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) on anterior segment morphology in primary angle-closure suspect (PACS) eyes.

METHODS

This prospective clinical trial included 144 patients with PACS who underwent either LPI or LE. Ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) and gonioscopy were performed before and 1 month and 2 years after operation. Main outcomes included UBM parameters and the percentage of residual angle closure.

RESULTS

At both 1 month and 2 years of follow-up, LE showed a better effect of relieving anterior chamber crowding and widening the drainage angle, as obtaining a larger anterior chamber depth (ACD), angle opening distance, trabecular iris angle (TIA), trabecular iris space area, trabecular ciliary process distance (TCPD) and a smaller iris curvature (I-Curv) and lens vault (LV) (p<0.001). In the LPI group, angle width increased (angle opening distance at 500 µm from the scleral spur, TIA and trabecular iris space area at 500 µm from the scleral spur) and I-Curv decreased (p<0.001) at 1 month postoperatively, with no significant changes in ACD, LV or TCPD. However, at 2 years after LPI, the angle narrowed with the increase in LV over time, and the proportion of residual angle closure also increased from 21.7% to 30.4% (p<0.001). In contrast, after LE, the widened angle width, flattened iris, deepened ACD, decreased LV and increased TCPD all showed good sustainability in the comparison between 1-month and 2-year follow-up. No residual angle closure was observed either at 1 month or 2 years after LE.

CONCLUSIONS

LE was prior to LPI in widening the drainage angle. After LPI, there was a narrowing of the angle and an increase in the proportion of residual angle closure over time. LE could achieve a wider angle with no residual angle closure, and the anterior segment parameters were sustainable.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR1800016511.

摘要

目的

比较原发性闭角型青光眼高危人群中行晶状体切除术(LE)与激光周边虹膜切开术(LPI)对眼前节形态的影响。

方法

本前瞻性临床试验纳入了 144 例原发性闭角型青光眼高危人群,他们分别接受了 LPI 或 LE 治疗。在术前及术后 1 个月和 2 年,使用超声生物显微镜(UBM)和房角镜进行检查。主要观察指标包括 UBM 参数和残余房角关闭的百分比。

结果

在术后 1 个月和 2 年随访时,LE 组在缓解前房拥挤和扩大房角方面效果更好,表现为前房深度(ACD)、房角开放距离(AOD)、小梁虹膜角度(TIA)、小梁虹膜空间面积(TISA)、小梁睫状体距离(TCPD)增加,虹膜曲率(I-Curv)和晶状体拱高(LV)减小(p<0.001)。在 LPI 组中,术后 1 个月时,巩膜突 500µm 处的房角宽度增加(AOD500、TIA500 和 TISA500),I-Curv 减小(p<0.001),而 ACD 和 LV 或 TCPD 无明显变化。然而,在 LPI 术后 2 年时,随着 LV 的增加,房角变窄,残余房角关闭的比例也从 21.7%增加到 30.4%(p<0.001)。相比之下,LE 术后,扩大的房角宽度、变平的虹膜、加深的 ACD、减小的 LV 和增加的 TCPD 在 1 个月和 2 年随访时的比较中均表现出良好的可持续性。LE 术后 1 个月和 2 年均未见残余房角关闭。

结论

与 LPI 相比,LE 更有利于扩大房角。LPI 后,随着时间的推移,房角变窄,残余房角关闭的比例增加。LE 可以实现更宽的房角而无残余房角关闭,并且前节参数可持续。

临床试验注册号

ChiCTR1800016511。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验