University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; IVF My Duc, My Duc Hospital and HOPE Research Center, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
IVF My Duc, My Duc Hospital and HOPE Research Center, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Fertil Steril. 2023 Apr;119(4):540-549. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.01.046. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
Oocyte in vitro maturation (IVM) has been proposed as an alternative to conventional ovarian stimulation (COS) in subfertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of IVM compared with COS in women with predicted hyperresponse to gonadotropins, we searched the published literature for relevant studies comparing any IVM protocol with any COS protocol followed by in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. A systematic review was undertaken on 3 eligible prospective studies. Live birth rate was not significantly lower after IVM vs. COS (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] of 0.56 [0.32-1.01] overall, 0.83 [0.63-1.10] for human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)-triggered IVM [hCG-IVM] and 0.45 [0.18-1.13] for non-hCG-triggered IVM [non-hCG-IVM]), irrespective of the stage of transferred embryos. Data from nonrandomized studies generally showed either significantly low or statistically comparable rates of live birth with IVM vs. COS. Most studies have not identified any significant difference between IVM and COS with respect to the rates of obstetric or perinatal complications, apart from a potentially higher rate of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy. The development of offspring from IVM and COS with in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection appears to be similar. Additional research is needed to identify which patient populations will benefit most from IVM, to define the appropriate clinical protocol, and to develop the optimal culture system.
体外成熟(IVM)已被提议作为多囊卵巢综合征不孕妇女中传统卵巢刺激(COS)的替代方法。为了评估 IVM 与预测对促性腺激素高反应的妇女中的 COS 相比的有效性和安全性,我们搜索了相关文献,以比较任何 IVM 方案与任何后续进行体外受精或胞浆内精子注射的 COS 方案。对 3 项合格的前瞻性研究进行了系统评价。与 COS 相比,IVM 后的活产率并没有显著降低(总体的优势比[95%置信区间]为 0.56[0.32-1.01],hCG 触发的 IVM[hCG-IVM]为 0.83[0.63-1.10],非 hCG 触发的 IVM[非 hCG-IVM]为 0.45[0.18-1.13]),而不管转移胚胎的阶段如何。非随机研究的数据通常表明,与 COS 相比,IVM 的活产率要么明显较低,要么统计学上可比。除了怀孕期间高血压疾病的潜在风险较高外,大多数研究都没有发现 IVM 与 COS 在产科或围产期并发症发生率方面存在任何显著差异。体外受精或胞浆内精子注射的 IVM 和 COS 产生的后代的发育似乎相似。需要进一步的研究来确定哪些患者群体将从 IVM 中受益最大,定义适当的临床方案,并开发最佳的培养系统。