Pharmacy, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
Pharmacy, Cooperman Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, New Jersey, USA.
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2024 Jun 21;31(4):327-331. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-003504.
When methicillin-resistant (MRSA) is the causative pathogen in pneumonia, in-hospital mortality rate is approximately 31.2%. However, the occurrence of MRSA pneumonia is uncommon, with a reported incidence of approximately 4.2%. Vancomycin is often empirically used for MRSA pneumonia coverage, but can lead to serious harm. The purpose of this study was to measure the impact of a pharmacy-driven MRSA nares testing protocol on vancomycin and linezolid prescribing patterns and clinical outcomes in patients diagnosed with pneumonia after removal of immediate educational intervention.
This single-centre, quasi-experimental study evaluated the use of a MRSA nasal swab on patients diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia, hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia. This study consisted of three phases, the preimplementation phase, the active/educational phase and the postimplementation phase. The primary outcome was intravenous anti-MRSA antibiotic duration of therapy. Secondary outcomes included the occurrence of acute kidney injury, duration of hospital stay, number of vancomycin levels obtained, the number of MRSA nares swabs ordered and time points in the MRSA nares collection process.
The preimplementation phase (n=39), the active phase (n=45) and the postimplementation phase (n=26) demonstrated similar baseline characteristics. The primary outcome for duration of anti-MRSA therapy 0-72 hours was 61.5% vs 77.8% vs 76.9% (p=0.19). Acute kidney injury was decreased throughout the study at 25.6%, 24.4% and 16.7% (p=0.32). The number of MRSA nares swabs ordered were 23.1%, 60% and 30.8% in each of the phases, respectively (p=0.49).
Our novel approach to measuring the impact of pharmacist education and ordering of MRSA nasal swabs has demonstrated benefits that were sustained for a short period after the intervention was removed. Additional study is required to determine the long-term impact.
The implementation of a hospital-wide anti-MRSA protocol in patients with confirmed or suspected pneumonia indicated sustained changes for at least 3 months after direct intervention.
当耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)是肺炎的致病病原体时,住院死亡率约为 31.2%。然而,MRSA 肺炎的发生率并不常见,据报道约为 4.2%。万古霉素常被经验性用于 MRSA 肺炎的覆盖,但会导致严重的伤害。本研究的目的是测量药剂师驱动的 MRSA 鼻腔检测方案对万古霉素和利奈唑胺处方模式的影响,并在去除直接教育干预后诊断为肺炎的患者的临床结果。
这项单中心、准实验性研究评估了对社区获得性肺炎、医院获得性肺炎和呼吸机相关性肺炎患者使用 MRSA 鼻腔拭子的情况。该研究包括三个阶段,实施前阶段、主动/教育阶段和实施后阶段。主要结局是静脉抗 MRSA 抗生素治疗的持续时间。次要结局包括急性肾损伤的发生、住院时间、万古霉素水平的获得数量、MRSA 鼻腔拭子的订购数量以及 MRSA 鼻腔采集过程中的时间点。
在实施前阶段(n=39)、主动阶段(n=45)和实施后阶段(n=26)中,患者的基线特征相似。抗 MRSA 治疗 0-72 小时的主要结局为 61.5%、77.8%和 76.9%(p=0.19)。整个研究过程中,急性肾损伤分别降低了 25.6%、24.4%和 16.7%(p=0.32)。在每个阶段,MRSA 鼻腔拭子的订购数量分别为 23.1%、60%和 30.8%(p=0.49)。
我们测量药剂师教育和订购 MRSA 鼻腔拭子的影响的新方法表明,在干预措施停止后,这种影响至少持续了很短的一段时间。需要进一步的研究来确定长期影响。
在确诊或疑似肺炎的患者中实施医院范围的抗 MRSA 方案,表明在直接干预停止后至少 3 个月内持续发生变化。