Department of Anesthesiology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Minerva Anestesiol. 2023 May;89(5):434-444. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.22.16972-5. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
Association between sugammadex and risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting remains unclear.
We performed meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis to compare sugammadex with neostigmine in adults receiving elective surgery under general anesthesia with postoperative extubation. Databases of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to April 15, 2022. Primary outcome was risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting after patients received sugammadex or neostigmine. Secondary outcomes were incidences of sugammadex-related complications.
Meta-analysis of 40 trials with 5455 patients showed an overall lower risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the sugammadex group than in the neostigmine group (risk ratio: 0.85, 95% CI [0.76-0.94], heterogeneity I2=4%, P=0.002). Subgroup analyses demonstrated a lower risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting associated with sugammadex than with neostigmine: 1) in the postanesthesia care unit (risk ratio: 0.77, 95% CI [0.66-0.90], I2=8%, P=0.001) but not in wards; 2) under volatile anesthetics but not total intravenous anesthesia; 3) regardless of the administration of prophylactic antiemetics; and 4) when sugammadex was administered at 2 mg/kg but not 4 mg/kg. No major complications such as cardiac arrest or refractory bradycardia were noted and every patient achieved adequate neuromuscular recovery before extubation in all of the included trials. The overall quality of evidence was moderate.
Sugammadex was associated with a lower risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting compared with neostigmine immediately after surgery, especially for patients receiving volatile anesthetics regardless of the use of prophylactic antiemetics.
舒更葡糖与术后恶心呕吐风险之间的关联尚不清楚。
我们进行了荟萃分析和试验序贯分析,比较了全身麻醉下接受择期手术的成年患者在拔除导管后使用舒更葡糖与新斯的明的情况。从 2022 年 4 月 15 日开始,我们检索了 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库的数据库。主要结局是患者接受舒更葡糖或新斯的明后发生术后恶心呕吐的风险。次要结局是舒更葡糖相关并发症的发生率。
对 40 项试验、5455 例患者进行的荟萃分析显示,舒更葡糖组的术后恶心呕吐风险总体低于新斯的明组(风险比:0.85,95%CI[0.76-0.94],异质性 I2=4%,P=0.002)。亚组分析表明,与新斯的明相比,舒更葡糖降低术后恶心呕吐风险:1)在麻醉后恢复室(风险比:0.77,95%CI[0.66-0.90],I2=8%,P=0.001),但不在病房;2)在使用挥发性麻醉剂时,而不是在使用全静脉麻醉时;3)无论是否给予预防性止吐药;4)在给予 2mg/kg 舒更葡糖而非 4mg/kg 舒更葡糖时。所有纳入的试验中,没有出现心脏骤停或难治性心动过缓等重大并发症,并且所有患者在拔除导管前均达到了充分的神经肌肉恢复。总体证据质量为中级。
与新斯的明相比,舒更葡糖可降低术后即刻恶心呕吐的风险,尤其是在使用挥发性麻醉剂的患者中,无论是否使用预防性止吐药。