Moriña-Vázquez Pablo, Esteve-Ruiz Irene, Moraleda-Salas María Teresa, Arce-León Álvaro, Manovel-Sánchez Ana José, Venegas-Gamero José, Lluch-Requerey Carmen, López-Masjuán-Ríos Álvaro, Gómez-Menchero Antonio Enrique
Arrhythmia Unit, Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario Juan Ramón Jiménez (HJRJ), Ronda Exterior Norte, s/n, 21005, Huelva, Spain.
Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario Juan Ramón Jiménez (HJRJ), Huelva, Spain.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023 Nov;66(8):1867-1876. doi: 10.1007/s10840-023-01503-1. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
His bundle pacing (HBP) is the most physiological form of ventricular pacing. Few prospective studies have analyzed lead localization using imaging techniques and its relationship with electrical parameters and capture patterns. The objective of this study is to examine the correlation between electrical parameters and lead localization using three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (3D TTE).
This single-center, prospective, nonrandomized clinical research study (January 2018 to June 2020) included patients with an indication of permanent pacing, in whom 3D TTE was performed to define lead localization as supravalvular or subvalvular.
A total of 92 patients were included: 56.5% of leads were supravalvular, and 43.5% were subvalvular, which resembles previous anatomic descriptions of autopsied hearts of His bundle localization within the triangle of Koch (ToK). R-wave sensing was higher when the His lead was localized subvalvular instead of supravalvular. His lead localization was not associated with HBP threshold or impedance differences, nor with the two different HBP patterns of capture, or with the ability of HBP to correct baseline BBB. The thresholds remained stable during follow-up visits, regardless of His lead localization. Higher R-wave sensing was observed during follow-up than at baseline, mainly in the subvalvular His leads. However, lead impedances in both positions decreased during follow-up.
Lead localization in relation to the tricuspid valve did not influence the electrical performance of HBPs. Wide anatomical variations of the His bundle within the ToK explain our findings, reinforcing the idea that the technique for HBP should be fundamentally guided by electrophysiological and not anatomical parameters.
希氏束起搏(HBP)是心室起搏最符合生理的形式。很少有前瞻性研究使用成像技术分析电极定位及其与电参数和夺获模式的关系。本研究的目的是使用三维经胸超声心动图(3D TTE)检查电参数与电极定位之间的相关性。
这项单中心、前瞻性、非随机临床研究(2018年1月至2020年6月)纳入了有永久性起搏指征的患者,对其进行3D TTE以将电极定位定义为瓣上或瓣下。
共纳入92例患者:56.5%的电极位于瓣上,43.5%位于瓣下,这与之前对尸检心脏中希氏束在科赫三角(ToK)内定位的解剖学描述相似。当希氏束电极位于瓣下而非瓣上时,R波感知更高。希氏束电极定位与HBP阈值或阻抗差异无关,也与两种不同的HBP夺获模式无关,与HBP纠正基线束支传导阻滞的能力无关。无论希氏束电极定位如何,随访期间阈值保持稳定。随访期间观察到的R波感知高于基线,主要是在瓣下希氏束电极中。然而,两个位置的电极阻抗在随访期间均降低。
与三尖瓣相关的电极定位不影响HBP的电性能。ToK内希氏束广泛的解剖变异解释了我们的发现,强化了HBP技术应从根本上由电生理而非解剖参数指导的观点。