Lv Zhendong, Chen Zehao, Chen Hao, Wang Jieying, Han Yingchao, Li Xinfeng, Shen Hongxing, Zhang Yuhui
Department of Spine Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
School of Mechatronic Engineering and Automation, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023 Apr 15;48(8):552-558. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004593. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
Prospective randomized controlled trial.
To clarify whether percutaneous curved vertebroplasty (PCVP) is superior to conventional unipedicular approach vertebroplasty (UVP) in patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).
Unilateral curved vertebroplasty devices were designed and applied to provide better control of cement placement, which may be superior to traditional UVP for the treatment of acute OVCFs.
Patients with single-level OVCFs of <6 weeks duration and visual analog scale (VAS) of back pain 5 or more were randomly allocated to undergo PCVP or UVP and were followed up for 1 year. The primary outcome was overall VAS scores for back pain during 12 months of follow-up. The secondary outcomes were scores on the Oswestry disability index at each postprocedure clinic visit. Radiographic (cement distribution) and surgical data (operation time, fluoroscopy frequency, and cement volume) were assessed. Complications and adverse events were recorded.
No statistical difference was found between the PCVP and UVP groups with respect to VAS and Oswestry disability index scores at any follow-up time point. Operative time, fluoroscopy frequency, and cement leakage were similar in both groups, while the PCVP techniques had a larger injection of polymethylmethacrylate (5.5 ± 1.4 vs . 4.2 ± 1.0 mL) and a greater dispersion pattern of cement ( P < 0.001). Post hoc observations found that the analgesic effect was positively correlated with the symmetry of bone cement distribution, but not with the surgical method. Two serious adverse events occurred in the vertebroplasty group: one stress ulcer and one allergic reaction.
Although PCVP achieved more symmetrical cement distribution, which seemed to be associated with a greater analgesic effect, PCVP did not result in significantly greater pain relief than a UVP in the 12 months after treatment.
前瞻性随机对照试验。
阐明经皮弯曲椎体成形术(PCVP)在急性骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCF)患者中是否优于传统单椎弓根入路椎体成形术(UVP)。
单侧弯曲椎体成形术装置被设计并应用以更好地控制骨水泥置入,这在治疗急性OVCF方面可能优于传统UVP。
将病程小于6周且背痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)为5分或更高的单节段OVCF患者随机分配接受PCVP或UVP,并随访1年。主要结局是随访12个月期间背痛的总体VAS评分。次要结局是每次术后门诊就诊时的Oswestry功能障碍指数评分。评估影像学(骨水泥分布)和手术数据(手术时间、透视频率和骨水泥体积)。记录并发症和不良事件。
在任何随访时间点,PCVP组和UVP组在VAS和Oswestry功能障碍指数评分方面均未发现统计学差异。两组的手术时间、透视频率和骨水泥渗漏情况相似,而PCVP技术注入的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯量更大(5.5±1.4对4.2±1.0 mL),骨水泥弥散模式更广泛(P<0.001)。事后观察发现镇痛效果与骨水泥分布的对称性呈正相关,而与手术方法无关。椎体成形术组发生了两起严重不良事件:1例应激性溃疡和1例过敏反应。
尽管PCVP实现了更对称的骨水泥分布,这似乎与更大的镇痛效果相关,但在治疗后的12个月内,PCVP并未比UVP带来显著更大的疼痛缓解。