阴茎性感和快感的解剖学图谱:割礼和未割礼男性之间有区别吗?

Anatomic maps of erogenous sensation and pleasure in the penis: are there difference between circumcised and uncircumcised men?

机构信息

Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.

Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.

出版信息

J Sex Med. 2023 Feb 27;20(3):253-259. doi: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdac032.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effects of male circumcision on sexual function remain controversial. Heterogeneity across previous studies and low-quality scientific evidence have resulted in poor understanding of the effects of circumcision on erogenous sensation of the penis and orgasm function.

AIM

In this study we sought to describe and assess differences in erogenous genital sensation and reported orgasm function in circumcised compared with uncircumcised men.

METHODS

Adult male subjects who were recruited on a paid anonymous online survey platform were shown illustrations of 12 anatomic regions of the penis. Subjects were prompted to designate regions as pleasurable when touched during partnered sex and to rate each on a 1-10 scale, with higher erogeneity scores correlating with greater pleasure. Subjects were also asked to characterize their orgasms across 6 experiential domains.

OUTCOMES

Outcomes were differences between circumcised and uncircumcised men in the probabilities that regions would be designated as pleasurable, average pleasure scores, and self-reported orgasm parameters.

RESULTS

In total, 227 circumcised (mean [SD] age 46.6 [17.7] years) and 175 uncircumcised men (47.8 [18.1] years) completed the survey. There were no significant differences in average ratings across all regions between circumcised and uncircumcised men. However, significantly more circumcised men reported preferences for the tip of the penis (38% vs 17%, P = .02) and the middle third of the ventral penile shaft (63% vs 48%, P = .04). Additionally, there were no significant differences in orgasm quality and function across all queried domains between circumcised and uncircumcised cohorts.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Our findings suggest that circumcision does not change how men describe erogenous genital sensation or how they experience orgasm.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

In this study we expanded upon existing literature regarding comparison of sexual function in circumcised and uncircumcised men in its scale and investigation of diverse domains. Limitations include the survey format of data collection.

CONCLUSION

We found no differences in reported erogenous ratings or orgasm function between circumcised and uncircumcised men. These findings suggest that male circumcision does not negatively impact penile erogeneity or orgasm function.

摘要

背景

男性割礼对性功能的影响仍存在争议。先前的研究存在异质性,且科学证据质量较低,导致人们对割礼对阴茎性敏感和性高潮功能的影响认识不足。

目的

本研究旨在描述和评估割礼与未割礼男性的生殖器性敏感和报告的性高潮功能差异。

方法

在付费匿名在线调查平台上招募成年男性受试者,向他们展示阴茎 12 个解剖区域的插图。提示受试者在有伴侣的性行为中触摸这些区域时,指定感到愉悦的区域,并在 1-10 的量表上对每个区域进行评分,较高的评分与更大的愉悦感相关。还要求受试者描述他们在 6 个体验领域的性高潮。

结果

割礼和未割礼男性在指定区域为愉悦区的概率、平均愉悦评分以及自我报告的性高潮参数方面存在差异。

结论

在这项研究中,我们发现割礼和未割礼男性在描述生殖器性敏感和体验性高潮方面没有差异。这些发现表明,男性割礼不会对阴茎性敏感或性高潮功能产生负面影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索