Lee Hyeonbo, Park Dong Hyeon, Kim Eun Jeong, Choi Mi-Jung
Department of Food Science and Biotechnology of Animal Resources, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea.
Kimchi Industry Promotion Division, Practical Technology Research Group, World Institute of Kimchi, Gwangju 61755, Republic of Korea.
Foods. 2023 Jan 22;12(3):510. doi: 10.3390/foods12030510.
Freezing raw laver is unsuitable for the laver industry due to process characteristics and economic problems. Therefore, this study attempted to investigate supercooled storage to extend the storage period without freezing, rather than refrigeration. To compare and analyze the storage ability of supercooling, the experiment was performed under refrigeration (5 °C), constant supercooling (CS, -2 °C), stepwise supercooling (SS, -2 °C), and freezing (-18 °C) conditions for 15 days, and the physicochemical changes according to the treatment and period were investigated. All SS samples, which were designed for stable supercooling, were kept in a supercooled state for 15 days. Two samples among the twelve total subjected to CS were frozen. At 9 days, the drip losses of the CS and SS samples were 6.32% and 6.48%, respectively, which was two times lower than that of refrigeration and three times lower than that of the frozen samples. The VBN of the refrigerated samples was 108.33 mg/100 g at 6 days, which exceeded the decomposition criterion. Simultaneously, the VBN of the other treatments was under the decomposition criterion of 30 mg/100 g. However, the VBN of both supercooling samples at 15 days increased to higher than the decomposition criterion. Regarding appearance, the refrigerated samples showed tissue destruction at 9 days, but tissue destruction of the CS and CC samples was observed at 15 days, and tissue destruction of the frozen samples was not observed until 15 days. Consequently, supercooling did not maintain quality for longer periods than freezing, but it did extend the shelf life more than refrigeration, and effectively preserved the quality for a short period.
由于工艺特性和经济问题,冷冻生鲜紫菜不适用于紫菜产业。因此,本研究试图探究过冷却储存,以在不冷冻而非冷藏的情况下延长储存期。为了比较和分析过冷却的储存能力,实验在冷藏(5℃)、恒定过冷却(CS,-2℃)、逐步过冷却(SS,-2℃)和冷冻(-18℃)条件下进行15天,并研究了根据处理方式和时间的理化变化。所有设计用于稳定过冷却的SS样品在过冷却状态下保持15天。在总共12个进行CS处理的样品中有2个被冷冻。在第9天,CS和SS样品的滴水损失分别为6.32%和6.48%,这比冷藏样品低两倍,比冷冻样品低三倍。冷藏样品在第6天的挥发性盐基氮(VBN)为108.33mg/100g,超过了分解标准。同时,其他处理的VBN低于30mg/100g的分解标准。然而,两个过冷却样品在第15天的VBN增加到高于分解标准。在外观方面,冷藏样品在第9天出现组织破坏,但CS和CC样品在第15天观察到组织破坏,而冷冻样品直到第15天才观察到组织破坏。因此,过冷却并没有比冷冻更长期地保持品质,但它确实比冷藏延长了保质期,并在短时间内有效地保持了品质。