Suppr超能文献

在危重症患者中,是否可以将采血样本的浪费量最小化?

Is minimising waste volume for drawing blood samples in critically ill patients feasible?

机构信息

Unidad de Cirugía Plástica, Reparadora y Quemados, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.

Unidad de Cirugía Plástica, Reparadora y Quemados, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Enferm Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2023 Jan-Mar;34(1):19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.enfie.2022.06.002. Epub 2023 Feb 9.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Drawing blood samples through a central venous catheter (CVC) is a customary practice in Intensive Care Units (ICUs). It is indicated to discard a volume of waste blood to avoid interference in the results.

AIM

To determine whether a lower discard volume for obtaining blood samples from temporary CVCs placed into the internal jugular, femoral or subclavian vein offers valid results.

METHOD

A quasi-experimental prospective cross-sectional study for which sixty-five patients of over 18 years of age in ICUs, who had been fitted with a triple lumen central venous catheter, were recruited over a period of eight months. Two consecutive blood samples were extracted with tubes for biochemistry, coagulation and hemogram from each patient from the distal lumen. The first sample was obtained with a discarded waste of 1.5 ml from a total extracted volume of 10.2 ml, similar to the usual waste in our ambit (10 ml). Subsequently the second sample was obtained. The paired t-test was used to analyse the data. The Bland-Altman plot and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to measure the agreement between methods. The reference change value (RCV) was established as the admissible limit of variation between the pairs of samples.

RESULTS

A total of 65 sample pairs were drawn (intervention-control). The paired t-test found statistically significant differences with a significance level of α = .05 for chlorine (-.536; .012); prothrombin time (-.092; .019) and prothrombin activity (.284; 1.375).The ICC was greater than .9 in all the variables and the limit determined for the RCV was not surpassed by any value.

CONCLUSIONS

The results show the reliability of the blood samples drawn with a discard volume of 1.5 ml.

摘要

介绍

在重症监护病房(ICU)中,通过中心静脉导管(CVC)采集血样是一种常规做法。这样做是为了丢弃一定量的废血,以避免对结果造成干扰。

目的

确定从临时 CVC 中采集血样时,减少丢弃的血量是否能提供有效的结果。

方法

这是一项准实验性前瞻性的横断研究,在 8 个月的时间里,从 ICU 中招募了 65 名年龄超过 18 岁、使用三腔中央静脉导管的患者。从每个患者的远端腔管中,用两支生化、凝血和血常规用的试管连续抽取两份血样。第一份样本是从总共抽取的 10.2 毫升中丢弃 1.5 毫升的废血获得的,与我们常规的丢弃量(10 毫升)相似。然后抽取第二份样本。采用配对 t 检验对数据进行分析。Bland-Altman 图和组内相关系数(ICC)用于评估两种方法之间的一致性。参考变化值(RCV)被确立为样本对之间可接受的变化限值。

结果

共抽取了 65 对样本(干预组-对照组)。配对 t 检验发现,氯(-.536;.012)、凝血酶原时间(-.092;.019)和凝血酶原活性(.284;1.375)在统计学上有显著差异,显著性水平为α=.05。所有变量的 ICC 均大于.9,且没有任何一个值超过 RCV 确定的限值。

结论

结果表明,丢弃 1.5 毫升废血采集的血样具有可靠性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验