Lee J, Lee H P
Department of Community, Occupational and Family Medicine, National University of Singapore, National University Hospital.
Comput Biol Med. 1987;17(5):357-62. doi: 10.1016/0010-4825(87)90025-4.
Statistical adjustment of baseline differences (bias attributable to confounding covariates) in the comparison of rates is often carried out by the stratification approach (e.g. the "direct standardization method"). However, this approach is usually not feasible for simultaneous adjustment of more than one confounding covariates given modest sample size. Also, the stratification approach requires grouping a continuous adjustment variable into broad categories, and consequently, residual confounding of the adjusted rates can still occur. These drawbacks can be overcome by multiple regression. This communication considers a statistical procedure for the comparison of occurrence rate of some event across two or more exposure or treatment groups adjusting for one or more confounding covariates. The procedure is based on the multiple logistic regression model. A detailed numeric example to illustrate the application of the method is presented. A computer program to carry out the statistical procedures is available from the authors.
在率的比较中,对基线差异(归因于混杂协变量的偏倚)进行统计调整通常采用分层方法(例如“直接标准化法”)。然而,鉴于样本量适中,这种方法通常无法对多个混杂协变量进行同时调整。此外,分层方法要求将连续的调整变量归为宽泛的类别,因此,调整后的率仍可能存在残余混杂。这些缺点可以通过多元回归来克服。本文探讨了一种统计程序,用于比较两个或多个暴露或治疗组中某事件的发生率,并对一个或多个混杂协变量进行调整。该程序基于多元逻辑回归模型。文中给出了一个详细的数值示例来说明该方法的应用。作者可提供执行这些统计程序的计算机程序。