Verma Shilpi, Bhatia Pradeep Kumar, Sharma Vandana, Mohammed Sadik, Saran Anita
Department of Anesthesiology, AIIMS, Raebarelly, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Oct-Dec;38(4):617-623. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_6_21. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α-2 adrenoreceptor agonist and has been found to be an effective premedication agent when administered via the intranasal route. We aimed to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine premedication administered via intranasal route and through nebulization in pediatric patients.
This non-inferiority randomized controlled trial was conducted after getting approval from institutes ethics committee and informed written parental consent. Sixty-four children aged 2-8 years scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled and were divided into two groups. Group I (Intranasal, n = 33) received 2 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine via intranasal route and group N (Nebulized, n = 31) received 2 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine through nebulization. The primary outcome was number of patients with satisfactory sedation 30 minutes after premedication at separation from parent. The secondary outcome included ease of medication acceptance, anxiety at parental separation, acceptance of anesthesia mask, perioperative hemodynamics, emergence agitation during recovery and adverse effects. Data collected was analyzed using Chi-square test, Student "t" test and Mann-Whitney U test with the help of SPSS 22. A one tailed value < 0.025 was considered significant.
Demographic profile was comparable between groups. On arrival in OR 27 (81.8%) patients in group I and 21 (67.7%) patients in group N had satisfactory sedation score ( = 0.19). The median (IQR) sedation score was comparable between group I and group N ( = 0.057). Patients in Group I showed significantly better medication and mask acceptance scores ( < 0.0001, = 0.001 respectively), parental separation anxiety score ( < 0.0001) and emergence agitation score ( = 0.001). There were no significant differences in hemodynamic parameters and adverse effects between the groups.
Although nebulized dexmedetomidine is non-inferior to intranasal dexmedetomidine in providing desired level of sedation but intranasal administration had better acceptance of medication and anesthesia mask with lesser anxiety at parental separation and postoperative emergence agitation.
右美托咪定是一种高选择性α-2肾上腺素能受体激动剂,已发现经鼻内途径给药时是一种有效的术前用药。我们旨在比较经鼻内途径和雾化吸入给予右美托咪定进行小儿患者术前用药的疗效。
本非劣效性随机对照试验在获得机构伦理委员会批准并取得家长书面知情同意后进行。纳入64例计划在全身麻醉下接受择期手术的2至8岁儿童,并分为两组。第一组(经鼻内给药,n = 33)经鼻内途径给予2 mcg/kg右美托咪定,第二组(雾化吸入给药,n = 31)通过雾化吸入给予2 mcg/kg右美托咪定。主要结局是术前用药30分钟后与父母分离时镇静效果满意的患者数量。次要结局包括用药接受程度、与父母分离时的焦虑、对麻醉面罩的接受程度、围手术期血流动力学、恢复期间的苏醒期躁动及不良反应。收集的数据在SPSS 22软件的帮助下采用卡方检验、学生t检验和曼-惠特尼U检验进行分析。单侧P值<0.025被认为具有统计学意义。
两组间人口统计学特征具有可比性。到达手术室时第一组27例(81.8%)患者和第二组21例(67.7%)患者镇静评分满意(P = 0.19)。第一组和第二组的中位(四分位间距)镇静评分具有可比性(P = 0.057)。第一组患者在用药接受程度和面罩接受评分方面(分别为P<0.0001,P = 0.00)、与父母分离时的焦虑评分(P<0.0001)以及苏醒期躁动评分(P = 0.001)方面均显著更好。两组间血流动力学参数和不良反应无显著差异。
尽管雾化吸入右美托咪定在提供所需镇静水平方面不劣于经鼻内给予右美托咪定,但经鼻内给药在用药和麻醉面罩接受程度方面更好,与父母分离时焦虑程度更低,术后苏醒期躁动更少。