Excler J L, Lasne Y, Sann L, Picard J
Service de Néonatologie, Hôpital Debrousse, Lyon, France.
Early Hum Dev. 1987 Sep;15(5):279-93. doi: 10.1016/0378-3782(87)90051-x.
Twenty appropriate (mean +/- S.D., gestational age (AGA): 29.9 +/- 1.5 weeks) and 15 small (GA: 34.6 +/- 2.4 weeks) for gestational age (SGA) very low birth weight infants fed banked mature human milk were studied until term for anthropometric parameters: midarm (MAC), chest (CC), head (HC) circumferences, triceps (TSKF) and subscapular (SSKF) skinfold thickness recorded at 15 and 60 s, dynamic skinfold (delta % SKF), muscle (AMA) and fat (AFA) areas, weight and length. In AGA infants, all the parameters at term were significantly lower in extrauterine (EUL) that in intrauterine life (IUL). At term the relative proportion of AFA to total arm area was increased in EUL compared to IUL both in AGA (25.87 +/- 3.8 vs. 23.26 +/- 1.27% respectively, P less than 0.01) and in SGA infants (21.89 +/- 4.63 vs. 18.81 +/- 3.9 respectively, P less than 0.05). SGA infants showed a similar growth in EUL compared to IUL, and a significantly lower AMA and AFA than in AGA infants in EUL. Although HC was in both infants below the 10th centile at term, the ratio weight/HC2 suggests a relative preservation of head growth in EUL compared to IUL (AGA: 20.72 less than 0.87 vs. 22.65 +/- 1.46 respectively, P less than 0.001; SGA; 20.82 +/- 1.16 vs. 21.62 +/- 1.86 respectively, NS). Delta %SKF were negatively correlated with post-conceptional age suggesting a loss of extracellular water in AGA (delta %TSKF: r = -0.287, P less than 0.02) and in SGA infants (delta %TSKF: r = -0.301, P less than 0.02; delta %SSKF: r = -0.316, P less than 0.02). An intrauterine model of discrimination between AGA and SGA infants does not apply to EUL. An equation was established in SGA infants with the best discriminant parameters giving a predictive post-conceptional age: post-conceptual age (PCA) (weeks) = 0.276 HC (cm) + 0.723 CC (cm) - 0.122 MAC (cm) + 0.5 TSKF (mm) + 10.173, (r = 0.867, P less than 0.001) allowing a clear discrimination between AGA and SGA infants. These results suggest that infants show quite different growth patterns between IUL and EUL both for AGA and SGA infants.
对20名适于胎龄(平均±标准差,胎龄(AGA):29.9±1.5周)和15名小于胎龄(GA:34.6±2.4周)的极低出生体重儿进行了研究,这些婴儿喂养的是储存的成熟人乳,直至足月时测量人体测量参数:15秒和60秒时记录的上臂围(MAC)、胸围(CC)、头围(HC)、肱三头肌皮褶厚度(TSKF)和肩胛下皮褶厚度(SSKF)、动态皮褶(δ%SKF)、肌肉面积(AMA)和脂肪面积(AFA)、体重和身长。在适于胎龄儿中,足月时宫外生长(EUL)的所有参数均显著低于宫内生长(IUL)。足月时,适于胎龄儿和小于胎龄儿在宫外生长时脂肪面积与总手臂面积的相对比例均高于宫内生长(适于胎龄儿分别为25.87±3.8%和23.26±1.27%,P<0.01;小于胎龄儿分别为21.89±4.63%和18.81±3.9%,P<0.05)。小于胎龄儿在宫外生长时与宫内生长时的生长情况相似,且宫外生长时的肌肉面积和脂肪面积显著低于适于胎龄儿。尽管两组婴儿足月时头围均低于第10百分位,但体重/头围²比值表明,与宫内生长相比,宫外生长时头部生长相对保留(适于胎龄儿分别为20.72±0.87和22.65±1.46,P<0.001;小于胎龄儿分别为20.82±1.16和21.62±1.86,无显著性差异)。δ%SKF与孕龄呈负相关,提示适于胎龄儿(δ%TSKF:r=-0.287,P<0.02)和小于胎龄儿(δ%TSKF:r=-0.301,P<0.02;δ%SSKF:r=-0.316,P<0.02)细胞外液丢失。区分适于胎龄儿和小于胎龄儿的宫内模型不适用于宫外生长。在小于胎龄儿中建立了一个具有最佳判别参数的方程,可预测孕龄:孕龄(PCA)(周)=0.276头围(cm)+0.723胸围(cm)-0.122上臂围(cm)+0.5肱三头肌皮褶厚度(mm)+10.173,(r=0.867,P<0.001),可清晰区分适于胎龄儿和小于胎龄儿。这些结果表明,适于胎龄儿和小于胎龄儿在宫内生长和宫外生长时的生长模式存在显著差异。