Eye Clinic Sulzbach, Knappschaft Hospital Saar GmbH, An der Klinik 10, 66280, Sulzbach, Germany.
Klaus Heimann Eye Research Institute (KHERI), An der Klinik 10, 66280, Sulzbach, Germany.
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Jul;43(7):2237-2245. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02619-5. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
To determine the efficacy of different fragmentation patterns in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) using Ziemer FEMTO LDV Z8.
We compared three different types of surgery: conventional cataract surgery (CCS), FLACS with conventional radial slices (named No-Spiderweb), and FLACS with a novel fragmentation pattern (radial slices combined with one or two rings) called "Spiderweb." Visual acuity (VA), nuclear opacity (NO) according to the Lens Opacities Classification System (LOCS lll), effective phacoemulsification time (EPT) and vacuum time were obtained for 845 eyes.
Using FLACS (Spiderweb + No-Spiderweb), EPT was significantly reduced by 26% compared to CCS (FLACS: 2.46 ± 2.60 s; CCS: 3.34 ± 2.89 s; ΔM = - 0.88 s, p < .001). Furthermore, EPT as a function of progression of lens opacity was found to be not only lower in Spiderweb compared to CCS, but also in comparison with No-Spiderweb. At NO3, a significant reduction of 65% in EPT was observed by using Spiderweb compared to CCS (Spiderweb: 0.68 ± 1.23 s; CCS: 1.96 ± 1.53 s; ΔM = - 1.28 s, p <.001). Interestingly, EPT at NO3 was also significantly reduced by 57% in Spiderweb compared to No-Spiderweb (Spiderweb: 0.68 ± 1.23 s; No-Spiderweb: 1.57 ± 1 .59 s; ΔM = - 0.90 s, p <.001). The use of Spiderweb only marginally extends the vacuum time compared to No-Spiderweb by 11 s (Spiderweb: 209.13 ± 35.83 s; No-Spiderweb: 198.35 ± 36.84 s; p = .003) and the postoperative improved VA showed no significant difference among the different types of surgery (all ps ≥ .05).
FLACS significantly reduces EPT compared to CCS. Furthermore, the novel Spiderweb pattern significantly reduces EPT in patients with a cataract of NO3 compared to CCS, but also to FLACS with the existing radial pattern (No-Spiderweb).
使用 Ziemer FEMTO LDV Z8 确定飞秒激光辅助白内障手术(FLACS)中不同粉碎模式的疗效。
我们比较了三种不同类型的手术:常规白内障手术(CCS)、无蜘蛛网状的传统径向切片 FLACS(命名为无蜘蛛网状)和新型粉碎模式(径向切片加一个或两个环)的 FLACS 称为“蜘蛛网状”。对 845 只眼的视力(VA)、核混浊(NO)根据 Lens Opacities Classification System(LOCS lll)、有效超声乳化时间(EPT)和真空时间进行了评估。
与 CCS 相比,使用 FLACS(蜘蛛网状+无蜘蛛网状),EPT 显著降低了 26%(FLACS:2.46±2.60 s;CCS:3.34±2.89 s;ΔM=-0.88 s,p<.001)。此外,发现 EPT 作为晶状体混浊进展的函数,不仅在蜘蛛网状中比 CCS 低,而且在无蜘蛛网状中也低。在 NO3 时,与 CCS 相比,蜘蛛网状显著降低了 65%的 EPT(蜘蛛网状:0.68±1.23 s;CCS:1.96±1.53 s;ΔM=-1.28 s,p<.001)。有趣的是,与无蜘蛛网状相比,蜘蛛网状在 NO3 时的 EPT 也显著降低了 57%(蜘蛛网状:0.68±1.23 s;无蜘蛛网状:1.57±1.59 s;ΔM=-0.90 s,p<.001)。与无蜘蛛网状相比,蜘蛛网状仅将真空时间延长了 11 秒(蜘蛛网状:209.13±35.83 s;无蜘蛛网状:198.35±36.84 s;p=0.003),并且不同类型手术的术后改善 VA 没有显著差异(所有 ps≥0.05)。
与 CCS 相比,FLACS 显著降低了 EPT。此外,与 CCS 相比,新型蜘蛛网状模式在 NO3 白内障患者中显著降低了 EPT,但与现有的径向模式(无蜘蛛网状)相比也是如此。