Emergency Department, Unidad de Corta Estancia y Hospitalización a Domicilio, Hospital General de Alicante; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL-Fundación FISABIO), Alicante. Spain.
Pulmonology Department Hospital Universitario HLA Moncloa, Nippon Gases Healthcare, Universidad Europea, Madrid, Spain.
Pulmonology. 2024 Sep-Oct;30(5):437-444. doi: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2023.01.004. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
To assess the efficacy and safety of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in elderly patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) not due to COVID-19, refractory to treatment with conventional oxygen therapy and/or intolerant to noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and without criteria for admission to intensive care units (ICU).
Prospective observational study of patients with ARF treated with HFNC who presented clinical and arterial blood gas deterioration after 24 h of medical treatment and oxygenation by conventional systems. The degree of dyspnoea, gas exchange parameters (arterial O pressure/inspired O fraction ratio (PaO/FiO); oxygen saturation measured by oximetry/ inspired fraction of oxygen (Sp0/Fi0), ROX index), degree of patient tolerance and mortality were evaluated. These were measured at discharge from the emergency department (ED), 24 h after treatment with conventional oxygenation and 60, 120 min and 24 h after initiation of HFNC. The results were analyzed for all patients as a whole and for patients with hypercapnia (arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO) < 45 mmHg) separately.
200 patients were included in the study between November 2019 and November 2020, with a mean age of 83 years, predominantly women (61.9%), obese (Body Mass Index (BMI) 31.1), with high comorbidity (Charlson index 4) and mild-moderate degree of dependence (Barthel 60). A number of 128 patients (64%) were hypercapnic. None had respiratory acidosis (pH 7.39). Evaluation at 60 min, 120 min and 24 h showed significant improvement in all patients and in the subgroup of hypercapnic patients with respect to baseline parameters in respiratory rate (RR), dyspnoea, ROX index, PaO/FiO, SpO/FiO and patient comfort. No changes in PaCO or level of consciousness were observed. HFNC was well tolerated. Ten patients (5%) died due to progression of the disease causing ARF.
HFNC is an effective and safe alternative in elderly patients with ARF not due to COVID-19, refractory to treatment with conventional oxygen therapy and/or intolerant to NIV or CPAP and without criteria for admission to ICU.
评估高流量鼻导管(HFNC)在非 COVID-19 导致的急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)老年患者中的疗效和安全性,这些患者对常规氧疗治疗有反应,或不耐受无创通气(NIV)或持续气道正压通气(CPAP),且不符合入住重症监护病房(ICU)的标准。
对因 ARF 接受 HFNC 治疗的患者进行前瞻性观察研究,这些患者在接受常规系统治疗和氧疗 24 小时后出现临床和动脉血气恶化。评估呼吸困难程度、气体交换参数(动脉氧分压/吸入氧分数比(PaO/FiO);血氧饱和度测量仪/吸入氧分数比(Sp0/Fi0)、ROX 指数)、患者耐受性和死亡率。这些参数在急诊科(ED)出院时、接受常规氧疗后 24 小时以及开始 HFNC 后 60、120 分钟和 24 小时进行测量。对所有患者作为一个整体以及对伴有高碳酸血症(动脉二氧化碳分压(PaCO)<45mmHg)的患者分别进行分析。
2019 年 11 月至 2020 年 11 月期间,共纳入 200 例患者,平均年龄为 83 岁,主要为女性(61.9%)、肥胖(体重指数(BMI)31.1)、合并症高(Charlson 指数 4)和轻度至中度依赖程度(巴氏指数 60)。128 例(64%)患者伴有高碳酸血症。无一例患者存在呼吸性酸中毒(pH 7.39)。在 60 分钟、120 分钟和 24 小时的评估中,所有患者以及伴有高碳酸血症的亚组患者的呼吸频率(RR)、呼吸困难、ROX 指数、PaO/FiO、SpO/FiO 和患者舒适度等基础参数均有显著改善。未观察到 PaCO 或意识水平的变化。HFNC 耐受性良好。由于导致 ARF 的疾病进展,10 例患者(5%)死亡。
HFNC 是一种有效且安全的选择,适用于非 COVID-19 导致的、对常规氧疗治疗有反应、不耐受 NIV 或 CPAP、且不符合入住 ICU 标准的 ARF 老年患者。