Suppr超能文献

籽骨位负重放射摄影与负重 CT 测量跖骨内翻角度的比较。

Sesamoid View Weightbearing Radiography vs Weightbearing Computed Tomography in the Measurement of Metatarsal Pronation Angle.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

出版信息

Foot Ankle Int. 2023 Apr;44(4):291-296. doi: 10.1177/10711007231153391. Epub 2023 Feb 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

First metatarsal pronation angle (MPA) is increasingly relevant in the management of hallux valgus and is assessed on weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) and sesamoid-view weightbearing radiography (WBR). The purpose of this study is to compare MPA measured by WBCT against WBR to determine if any systematic discrepancy in MPA measurement exists between the 2 modalities.

METHODS

A total of 40 patients with 55 feet were included for study. MPA was measured in all patients by 2 independent readers on both WBCT and WBR with an appropriate washout period between measurement modalities. Mean MPA by WBCT and WBR were analyzed; interobserver reliability was calculated with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value.

RESULTS

Mean MPA as measured by WBCT was 3.7 ± 7.9 degrees (95% CI, 1.6-5.9; range -11.7 to 20.5). Mean MPA measured on WBR was 3.6 ± 8.4 degrees, (95% CI, 1.4-5.8; range -12.6 to 21.4). There was no difference in MPA as measured by WBCT compared to WBR ( = .529). Interobserver reliability was excellent with an ICC of 0.994 for WBCT and 0.986 for WBR.

CONCLUSION

Measurement of first MPA by WBCT and WBR was not significantly different. In our cohort of patients with and without forefoot pathology, we found that either sesamoid view weightbearing radiographs or weightbearing CT can be used reliably to measure first MPA and will generate similar values.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

摘要

背景

第一跖骨内翻角(MPA)在治疗拇外翻中越来越重要,可通过负重 CT(WBCT)和籽骨位负重 X 线片(WBR)进行评估。本研究旨在比较 WBCT 和 WBR 测量的 MPA,以确定这两种方法在 MPA 测量中是否存在任何系统差异。

方法

共纳入 40 例 55 足患者进行研究。所有患者均由 2 名独立观察者在 WBCT 和 WBR 上测量 MPA,并在测量方式之间留有适当的洗脱期。分析 WBCT 和 WBR 测量的平均 MPA;采用组内相关系数(ICC)值计算观察者间可靠性。

结果

WBCT 测量的平均 MPA 为 3.7±7.9 度(95%CI,1.6-5.9;范围-11.7 至 20.5)。WBR 测量的平均 MPA 为 3.6±8.4 度,(95%CI,1.4-5.8;范围-12.6 至 21.4)。WBCT 与 WBR 测量的 MPA 无差异( =.529)。观察者间可靠性极佳,WBCT 的 ICC 为 0.994,WBR 的 ICC 为 0.986。

结论

WBCT 和 WBR 测量第一跖骨内翻角无显著差异。在我们的患者队列中,有或没有前足病变,我们发现籽骨位负重 X 线片或负重 CT 均可可靠地用于测量第一跖骨内翻角,并产生相似的数值。

证据水平

IV 级,病例系列。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验