Suppr超能文献

全麻与非全麻在缺血性脑卒中血管内取栓治疗中的比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

General Anesthesia Compared With Non-GA in Endovascular Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

机构信息

From the Auckland City Hospital (D.C., E.B.); University of Otago (R.B.C.), Dunedin; and University of Auckland (J.H., P.A.B.), New Zealand.

出版信息

Neurology. 2023 Apr 18;100(16):e1655-e1663. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207066. Epub 2023 Feb 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke is either performed under general anesthesia (GA) or with non-GA techniques such as conscious sedation or local anesthesia alone. Previous small meta-analyses have demonstrated superior recanalization rates and improved functional recovery with GA when compared with non-GA techniques. The publication of further randomized controlled trials (RCTs) could provide updated guidance when choosing between GA and non-GA techniques.

METHODS

A systematic search for trials in which stroke EVT patients were randomized to GA or non-GA was performed in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. A systematic review and meta-analysis using a random-effects model was performed.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. These trials included a total of 980 participants (GA, N = 487; non-GA, N = 493). GA improves recanalization by 9.0% (GA 84.6% vs non-GA 75.6%; odds ratio [OR] 1.75, 95% CI 1.26-2.42, = 0.0009), and the proportion of patients with functional recovery improves by 8.4% (GA 44.6% vs non-GA 36.2%; OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.04-1.98, = 0.03). There was no difference in hemorrhagic complications or 3-month mortality.

DISCUSSION

In patients with ischemic stroke treated with EVT, GA is associated with higher recanalization rates and improved functional recovery at 3 months compared with non-GA techniques. Conversion to GA and subsequent intention-to-treat analysis will underestimate the true therapeutic benefit. GA is established as effective in improving recanalization rates in EVT (7 Class 1 studies) with a high Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) certainty rating. GA is established as effective in improving functional recovery at 3 months in EVT (5 Class 1 studies) with a moderate GRADE certainty rating. Stroke services need to develop pathways to incorporate GA as the first choice for most EVT procedures in acute ischemic stroke with a level A recommendation for recanalization and level B recommendation for functional recovery.

摘要

背景与目的

对于大血管闭塞性缺血性脑卒中,血管内血栓切除术(EVT)可在全身麻醉(GA)下进行,也可采用清醒镇静或局部麻醉等非 GA 技术进行。先前的小Meta 分析表明,与非 GA 技术相比,GA 可提高再通率和改善功能恢复。进一步的随机对照试验(RCT)的发表可能会在选择 GA 与非 GA 技术时提供更新的指导。

方法

在 Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册数据库中,对将卒中 EVT 患者随机分配至 GA 或非 GA 组的试验进行了系统检索。使用随机效应模型进行了系统评价和 Meta 分析。

结果

系统评价和 Meta 分析共纳入 7 项 RCT,共纳入 980 名患者(GA 组 487 名,非 GA 组 493 名)。GA 可使再通率提高 9.0%(GA 为 84.6%,非 GA 为 75.6%;比值比 [OR] 1.75,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.26-2.42, = 0.0009),功能恢复的患者比例提高 8.4%(GA 为 44.6%,非 GA 为 36.2%;OR 1.43,95% CI 1.04-1.98, = 0.03)。两组的出血性并发症或 3 个月死亡率无差异。

讨论

在接受 EVT 治疗的缺血性卒中患者中,与非 GA 技术相比,GA 可提高再通率和 3 个月时的功能恢复。转换为 GA 并进行意向治疗分析可能会低估真实的治疗益处。GA 已被证实可有效提高 EVT 的再通率(7 项 1 级研究),具有较高的推荐等级、评估、制定和评估(GRADE)确定性评分。GA 已被证实可有效提高 EVT 后 3 个月的功能恢复(5 项 1 级研究),具有中等 GRADE 确定性评分。卒中服务机构需要制定途径,将 GA 作为大多数急性缺血性卒中 EVT 治疗的首选,对再通的推荐等级为 A,对功能恢复的推荐等级为 B。

相似文献

3
Type of anesthesia for endovascular therapy in acute ischemic stroke: A literature review and meta-analysis.
Int J Stroke. 2024 Aug;19(7):735-746. doi: 10.1177/17474930241228956. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
7
Anesthesia-Related Outcomes for Endovascular Stroke Revascularization: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Stroke. 2017 Oct;48(10):2784-2791. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017786. Epub 2017 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

5
General Anesthesia Versus Conscious Sedation in Thrombectomy Patients With Low NIHSS Anterior Circulation Stroke.
Stroke. 2025 May;56(5):1191-1199. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.049358. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
6
Delirium following mechanical thrombectomy for ischemic stroke - individuals at risk, imaging biomarkers and prognosis.
Front Aging Neurosci. 2025 Feb 14;17:1486726. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1486726. eCollection 2025.
7
Time trends in mechanical thrombectomy (2017-2021): do real-world data reflect advances in evidence?
Front Neurol. 2025 Feb 11;15:1517276. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1517276. eCollection 2024.
9
A pragmatic view on general anesthesia in mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2025 May-Jun;75(3):844599. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2025.844599. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
10
2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.
Circulation. 2025 Feb 25;151(8):e41-e660. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001303. Epub 2025 Jan 27.

本文引用的文献

2
Anaesthesia for mechanical thrombectomy: a narrative review.
Anaesthesia. 2022 Jan;77 Suppl 1:59-68. doi: 10.1111/anae.15586.
10
Land of confusion: anaesthetic management during thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke.
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Mar;122(3):300-304. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.12.004. Epub 2019 Jan 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验