From the Auckland City Hospital (D.C., E.B.); University of Otago (R.B.C.), Dunedin; and University of Auckland (J.H., P.A.B.), New Zealand.
Neurology. 2023 Apr 18;100(16):e1655-e1663. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207066. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke is either performed under general anesthesia (GA) or with non-GA techniques such as conscious sedation or local anesthesia alone. Previous small meta-analyses have demonstrated superior recanalization rates and improved functional recovery with GA when compared with non-GA techniques. The publication of further randomized controlled trials (RCTs) could provide updated guidance when choosing between GA and non-GA techniques.
A systematic search for trials in which stroke EVT patients were randomized to GA or non-GA was performed in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. A systematic review and meta-analysis using a random-effects model was performed.
Seven RCTs were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. These trials included a total of 980 participants (GA, N = 487; non-GA, N = 493). GA improves recanalization by 9.0% (GA 84.6% vs non-GA 75.6%; odds ratio [OR] 1.75, 95% CI 1.26-2.42, = 0.0009), and the proportion of patients with functional recovery improves by 8.4% (GA 44.6% vs non-GA 36.2%; OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.04-1.98, = 0.03). There was no difference in hemorrhagic complications or 3-month mortality.
In patients with ischemic stroke treated with EVT, GA is associated with higher recanalization rates and improved functional recovery at 3 months compared with non-GA techniques. Conversion to GA and subsequent intention-to-treat analysis will underestimate the true therapeutic benefit. GA is established as effective in improving recanalization rates in EVT (7 Class 1 studies) with a high Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) certainty rating. GA is established as effective in improving functional recovery at 3 months in EVT (5 Class 1 studies) with a moderate GRADE certainty rating. Stroke services need to develop pathways to incorporate GA as the first choice for most EVT procedures in acute ischemic stroke with a level A recommendation for recanalization and level B recommendation for functional recovery.
对于大血管闭塞性缺血性脑卒中,血管内血栓切除术(EVT)可在全身麻醉(GA)下进行,也可采用清醒镇静或局部麻醉等非 GA 技术进行。先前的小Meta 分析表明,与非 GA 技术相比,GA 可提高再通率和改善功能恢复。进一步的随机对照试验(RCT)的发表可能会在选择 GA 与非 GA 技术时提供更新的指导。
在 Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册数据库中,对将卒中 EVT 患者随机分配至 GA 或非 GA 组的试验进行了系统检索。使用随机效应模型进行了系统评价和 Meta 分析。
系统评价和 Meta 分析共纳入 7 项 RCT,共纳入 980 名患者(GA 组 487 名,非 GA 组 493 名)。GA 可使再通率提高 9.0%(GA 为 84.6%,非 GA 为 75.6%;比值比 [OR] 1.75,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.26-2.42, = 0.0009),功能恢复的患者比例提高 8.4%(GA 为 44.6%,非 GA 为 36.2%;OR 1.43,95% CI 1.04-1.98, = 0.03)。两组的出血性并发症或 3 个月死亡率无差异。
在接受 EVT 治疗的缺血性卒中患者中,与非 GA 技术相比,GA 可提高再通率和 3 个月时的功能恢复。转换为 GA 并进行意向治疗分析可能会低估真实的治疗益处。GA 已被证实可有效提高 EVT 的再通率(7 项 1 级研究),具有较高的推荐等级、评估、制定和评估(GRADE)确定性评分。GA 已被证实可有效提高 EVT 后 3 个月的功能恢复(5 项 1 级研究),具有中等 GRADE 确定性评分。卒中服务机构需要制定途径,将 GA 作为大多数急性缺血性卒中 EVT 治疗的首选,对再通的推荐等级为 A,对功能恢复的推荐等级为 B。