文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Shared decision making with schizophrenic patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial with booster sessions (DECIDE Study).

作者信息

Pérez-Revuelta Jose I, González-Sáiz Francisco, Pascual-Paño Juan M, Mongil-San Juan Jose M, Rodríguez-Gómez Carmen, Muñoz-Manchado Leticia I, Mestre-Morales Jesús, Berrocoso Esther, Villagrán Moreno Jose Ma

机构信息

Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Salud Mental, Área de Gestión Sanitaria Norte de Cádiz, Hospital General Universitario de Jerez de la Frontera, Cádiz, Spain; Instituto de Investigación e Innovación Biomédica de Cádiz (INiBICA), Cádiz, Spain; Departamento Neurociencias, Área Psiquiatría, Universidad de Cádiz, Spain; Sever Mental Disorder Research Group, Department of Neuroscience, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain.

Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Salud Mental, Área de Gestión Sanitaria Norte de Cádiz, Hospital General Universitario de Jerez de la Frontera, Cádiz, Spain; Instituto de Investigación e Innovación Biomédica de Cádiz (INiBICA), Cádiz, Spain; Departamento Neurociencias, Área Psiquiatría, Universidad de Cádiz, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Sever Mental Disorder Research Group, Department of Neuroscience, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2023 May;110:107656. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107656. Epub 2023 Feb 15.


DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2023.107656
PMID:36807126
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The treatment of schizophrenia requires a prolonged, multidimensional intervention that includes antipsychotic drugs. Treatment adherence is essential to effectively control the disorder. Shared decision-making (SDM) is a strategy, supported by numerous practical and ethical arguments, that seeks to involve patients in the therapeutic process to improve treatment adherence and satisfaction. The use of this model in mental health has been limited for many intrinsic and extrinsic reasons. The results of clinical trials conducted to date have largely been disappointing, potential due to study design-related limitations. AIM/QUESTION: To evaluate the efficacy, in terms of treatment adherence and improvement in clinical variables, such as severity of symptoms, days of hospitalization or insight, of a carefully timed SDM model initiated immediately prior to hospital discharge in patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: Single-blind, randomized clinical trial in an acute psychiatric care unit within the Andalusian Health Department to compare SDM (experimental group) to treatment as usual (TAU; control group) in a sample of patients hospitalized for an acute episode of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. The study was performed between January 2014 and June 2017. The experimental group participated in SDM sessions prior to discharge with regular booster sessions over the one-year follow-up. The health care team responsible for SDM was predisposed to concordance (LatCon II scale) and received specific training in SDM. A hierarchical multiple linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the factors independently associated with adherence, controlling for sociodemographic, clinical, and admission-related variables. Variables were assessed at admission, discharge and at 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge during the one year follow up. BARS, DAI, WAI-S, COMRADE and PANSS were used to evaluate adherence, attitude to treatment, therapeutic alliance, satisfaction and confidence with decision and clinical status, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 227 schizophrenic patients hospitalized with acute decompensation were evaluated; of these, 102 met all inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Most patients (95%) had prior experience with antipsychotics and most (82%) had experienced related side effects. Despite randomization, psychopathologic severity was greater in the experimental group, with a mean (SD) PANSS score of 104.08 (80) vs. 93.45 (20.30) (p < 0.05). The final regression model to explain adherence was significant (adjusted R2 = 0.384; F [df= 6] = 4.386; p < 0.001), with a direct, significant and independent association with SDM mediated by the number of booster sessions. DISCUSSION: Shared decision making with booster sessions appears to increase treatment adherence in patients with severe mental disorders. IMPLICATION ON PRACTICE: Ethical, practical, and clinical reasons support the use of strategies designed promote the use of long-term, shared decision-making in psychiatric patients, especially in schizophrenia spectrum disorder.

摘要

相似文献

[1]
Shared decision making with schizophrenic patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial with booster sessions (DECIDE Study).

Patient Educ Couns. 2023-5

[2]
Evidence-based Shared-Decision-Making Assistant (SDM-assistant) for choosing antipsychotics: protocol of a cluster-randomized trial in hospitalized patients with schizophrenia.

BMC Psychiatry. 2022-6-17

[3]
Implementing shared decision-making on acute psychiatric wards: a cluster-randomized trial with inpatients suffering from schizophrenia (SDM-PLUS).

Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020-6-16

[4]
The Momentum trial: the efficacy of using a smartphone application to promote patient activation and support shared decision making in people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia in outpatient treatment settings: a randomized controlled single-blind trial.

BMC Psychiatry. 2019-6-17

[5]
Shared decision making PLUS - a cluster-randomized trial with inpatients suffering from schizophrenia (SDM-PLUS).

BMC Psychiatry. 2017-2-23

[6]
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1

[7]
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-10-3

[8]
Feasibility and efficacy of shared decision making for first-admission schizophrenia: a randomized clinical trial.

BMC Psychiatry. 2017-2-6

[9]
A Smartphone App to Promote Patient Activation and Support Shared Decision-making in People With a Diagnosis of Schizophrenia in Outpatient Treatment Settings (Momentum Trial): Randomized Controlled Assessor-Blinded Trial.

J Med Internet Res. 2022-10-26

[10]
Training patients with schizophrenia to share decisions with their psychiatrists: a randomized-controlled trial.

Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017-2

引用本文的文献

[1]
Shared Decision-Making in the Management of Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review.

Cureus. 2025-6-30

[2]
From Idealist to Realist-Designing and Implementing Shared Decision-Making Interventions in the Choice of Antipsychotic Prescription in People Living with Psychosis (SHAPE): A Realist Review.

Schizophr Bull. 2025-7-7

[3]
From Idealist to Realist-Designing and Implementing Shared Decision-Making Interventions in the Choice of Antipsychotic Prescription in People Living With Psychosis (SHAPE): A Realist Review (Part 2-Designing SDM Interventions: Optimizing Design and Local Implementation).

Schizophr Bull. 2025-7-7

[4]
Effect of comprehensive intervention model based on drug-psychology-society-skills on medication compliance and cognitive ability of chronic schizophrenia patients.

World J Psychiatry. 2024-12-19

[5]
Preliminary data from a 4-year mirror-image and multicentre study of patients initiating paliperidone palmitate 6-monthly long-acting injectable antipsychotic: the Paliperidone 2 per Year study.

Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2023-12-26

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索