Suppr超能文献

传统与高功率短程射频应用于肺静脉隔离的多中心前瞻性比较:高功率短程射频应用实现更快更安全的肺静脉消融(POWER FAST III)试验

Multicenter prospective comparison of conventional and high-power short duration radiofrequency application for pulmonary vein isolation: the high-power short-duration radiofrequency application for faster and safer pulmonary vein ablation (POWER FAST III) trial.

作者信息

Castrejón-Castrejón Sergio, Martínez Cossiani Marcel, Jáuregui-Abularach Miguel, Basterra Sola Nuria, Ibáñez Criado José Luis, Osca Asensi Joaquín, Roca Luque Ivo, Moya Mitjans Angel, Quesada Dorador Aurelio, Hidalgo Olivares Víctor Manuel, Pérez Castellano Nicasio, Fernández Gómez Juan Manuel, Macías-Ruiz María Rosa, Bochard Villanueva Bruno, Gonzalo Bada Nerea, Fernández Prieto Andrés, Guido López Leonardo Elías, Martínez Maldonado María Eugenia, Merino Daniel, Escobar Cervantes Carlos, Merino José Luis

机构信息

Arrhythmia & Robotic EP Unit, Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain.

Cardiology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra-IdiSNA (Navarra Institute for Health Research), Pamplona, Spain.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023 Nov;66(8):1889-1899. doi: 10.1007/s10840-023-01509-9. Epub 2023 Feb 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Electrical isolation of pulmonary veins (PV) with high-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency application (RFa) may reduce the duration of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, without compromising the procedural efficacy and safety in comparison with the conventional approach. This hypothesis has been generated in several observational studies; the POWER FAST III will test it in a randomized multicenter clinical trial.

METHODS

It is a multicenter randomized, open-label and non-inferiority clinical trial with two parallel groups. AF ablation using 70 W and 9-10 s RFa is compared with the conventional technique using 25-40 W RFa guided by numerical lesion indexes. The main efficacy objective is the incidence of atrial arrhythmia recurrences electrocardiographically documented during 1-year follow-up. The main safety objective is the incidence of endoscopically detected esophageal thermal lesions (EDEL). This trial includes a substudy of incidence of asymptomatic cerebral lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after ablation.

RESULTS

A randomized clinical trial compares for the first time high-power short-duration and conventional ablation in order to obtain data about the efficacy and safety of the high-power technique in an adequate methodological context.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the POWER FAST III could support the use of the high-power short-duration ablation in clinical practice.

REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NTC04153747.

摘要

背景

与传统方法相比,采用高功率短持续时间(HPSD)射频消融术(RFa)对肺静脉(PV)进行电隔离,可能会缩短心房颤动(AF)消融的持续时间,且不影响手术疗效和安全性。这一假设已在多项观察性研究中提出;POWER FAST III将在一项随机多中心临床试验中对其进行验证。

方法

这是一项多中心随机、开放标签且非劣效性的临床试验,设有两个平行组。将使用70W和9 - 10秒RFa的AF消融术与使用数值损伤指数指导的25 - 40W RFa的传统技术进行比较。主要疗效指标是1年随访期间心电图记录的房性心律失常复发率。主要安全性指标是内镜检测到的食管热损伤(EDEL)发生率。该试验包括一项关于消融后通过磁共振成像(MRI)检测无症状脑损伤发生率的子研究。

结果

一项随机临床试验首次对高功率短持续时间消融术和传统消融术进行比较,以便在适当的方法学背景下获取有关高功率技术疗效和安全性的数据。

结论

POWER FAST III的结果可能支持在临床实践中使用高功率短持续时间消融术。

注册信息

ClinicalTrials.gov:NTC04153747。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验