• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) and Research Ethics负责任的研究与创新(RRI)及研究伦理
2
Devices of Responsibility: Over a Decade of Responsible Research and Innovation Initiatives for Nanotechnologies.责任装置:十余年纳米技术负责任研究与创新倡议
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Dec;24(6):1719-1746. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9978-z. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
3
Structural Transformation to Attain Responsible BIOSciences (STARBIOS2): Protocol for a Horizon 2020 Funded European Multicenter Project to Promote Responsible Research and Innovation.实现负责任生物科学的结构转型(STARBIOS2):一项由“地平线2020”资助的欧洲多中心项目促进负责任研究与创新的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Mar 7;8(3):e11745. doi: 10.2196/11745.
4
Responsible Research and Innovation and India: A Case for Contextualization and Mutual Learning负责任的研究与创新及印度:情境化与相互学习的实例
5
Contextualizing Security Innovation: Responsible Research and Innovation at the Smart Border?语境化安全创新:智慧边境的负责任研究与创新?
Sci Eng Ethics. 2021 Feb 18;27(1):13. doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00292-y.
6
Definitions and Conceptual Dimensions of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Literature Review.负责任的研究与创新的定义和概念维度:文献综述
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Feb;23(1):1-19. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9782-1. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
7
Standardising Responsibility? The Significance of Interstitial Spaces.规范责任?间隙空间的重要性。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Oct;21(5):1159-80. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9602-4. Epub 2014 Oct 26.
8
Creative tensions: mutual responsiveness adapted to private sector research and development.创造性张力:适应私营部门研发的相互响应能力。
Life Sci Soc Policy. 2017 Sep 7;13(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40504-017-0058-6.
9
"Broader impacts" or "responsible research and innovation"? A comparison of two criteria for funding research in science and engineering.“更广泛的影响”还是“负责任的研究与创新”?科学与工程领域研究资助的两项标准之比较
Sci Eng Ethics. 2014 Dec;20(4):963-83. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9480-1. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
10
Linking policy and practice in monitoring socially responsible research and innovation (RRI): A conceptual framework to evaluate progress through the UNESCO-led Recommendation on Science and Scientific Researchers.在监测社会责任型研究与创新(RRI)中连接政策与实践:一个通过联合国教科文组织主导的《关于科学和科研人员的建议》来评估进展的概念框架。
Open Res Eur. 2023 Jul 24;2:21. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.14263.2. eCollection 2022.

负责任的研究与创新(RRI)及研究伦理

Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) and Research Ethics

作者信息

Declich Giovanna, Berliri Maresa, Alfonsi Alfonso

机构信息

Knowledge and Innovation, Rome, Italy

DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-15746-2_2
PMID:36810059
Abstract

The case study presented in this chapter concerns the policy adopted by the European Commission for better management of the relationship between science and society, with a focus on the ethics of scientific research. This policy, since 2011, has been based on the notion of responsible research and innovation (RRI). We discuss the RRI strategy as an attempt to include ethics within a broader policy framework to respond to the challenges emerging in the European research and innovation landscape. To do so, we examine the origins of the RRI idea, its incorporation into Commission policy, as well as its effectiveness and its impacts. We further discuss whether it has served its purpose in light of the fact that the terminology associated with RRI has been progressively downplayed in more recent years. Positive impacts exist, but also difficulties as RRI aims to take root and enhance and strengthen its ethical aspects. In conclusion, some lessons learned from this ten-year policy effort are presented, exploring the potentialities and limits of such an approach for the renewal of research ethics, and discussing what can be the theoretical and practical legacy of RRI for contemporary scientific and technological innovation policies.

摘要

本章介绍的案例研究涉及欧盟委员会为更好地管理科学与社会关系所采取的政策,重点是科学研究的伦理问题。自2011年以来,这项政策一直基于负责任的研究与创新(RRI)理念。我们将RRI战略作为一种尝试进行讨论,即在更广泛的政策框架内纳入伦理,以应对欧洲研究与创新领域出现的挑战。为此,我们考察了RRI理念的起源、其纳入委员会政策的情况,以及其有效性和影响。鉴于近年来与RRI相关的术语已逐渐被淡化,我们进一步讨论它是否达到了目的。虽然存在积极影响,但RRI在扎根并加强其伦理方面也面临困难。最后,我们总结了这十年政策努力的一些经验教训,探讨这种方法在更新研究伦理方面的潜力和局限性,并讨论RRI对当代科技创新政策可能产生的理论和实践遗产。