Rioja José, Ariza María José, Benítez-Toledo María José, Espíldora-Hernández Javier, Coca-Prieto Inmaculada, Arrobas-Velilla Teresa, Camacho Ana, Olivecrona Gunilla, Sánchez-Chaparro Miguel Ángel, Valdivielso Pedro
Lipids and Atherosclerosis Laboratory, Department of Medicine and Dermatology, Centro de Investigaciones Médico Sanitarias (CIMES), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain (Drs Rioja, Ariza, Sánchez-Chaparro and Valdivielso).
Lipids and Atherosclerosis Laboratory, Department of Medicine and Dermatology, Centro de Investigaciones Médico Sanitarias (CIMES), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain (Drs Rioja, Ariza, Sánchez-Chaparro and Valdivielso).
J Clin Lipidol. 2023 Mar-Apr;17(2):272-280. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2023.01.005. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
Activity assays for lipoprotein lipase (LPL) are not standardised for use in clinical settings.
This study sought to define and validate a cut-off points based on a ROC curve for the diagnosis of patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS). We also evaluated the role of LPL activity in a comprehensive FCS diagnostic workflow.
A derivation cohort (including an FCS group (n = 9), a multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome (MCS) group (n = 11)), and an external validation cohort (including an FCS group (n = 5), a MCS group (n = 23) and a normo-triglyceridemic (NTG) group (n = 14)), were studied. FCS patients were previously diagnosed by the presence of biallelic pathogenic genetic variants in the LPL and GPIHBP1 genes. LPL activity was also measured. Clinical and anthropometric data were recorded, and serum lipids and lipoproteins were measured. Sensitivity, specificity and cut-offs for LPL activity were obtained from a ROC curve and externally validated.
All post-heparin plasma LPL activity in the FCS patients were below 25.1 mU/mL, that was cut-off with best performance. There was no overlap in the LPL activity distributions between the FCS and MCS groups, conversely to the FCS and NTG groups.
We conclude that, in addition to genetic testing, LPL activity in subjects with severe hypertriglyceridemia is a reliable criterium in the diagnosis of FCS when using a cut-off of 25.1 mU/mL (25% of the mean LPL activity in the validation MCS group). We do not recommend the NTG patient based cut-off values due to low sensitivity.
脂蛋白脂肪酶(LPL)活性检测在临床应用中尚未标准化。
本研究旨在基于ROC曲线确定并验证用于诊断家族性乳糜微粒血症综合征(FCS)患者的截断点。我们还评估了LPL活性在全面的FCS诊断流程中的作用。
研究了一个推导队列(包括一个FCS组(n = 9)、一个多因素乳糜微粒血症综合征(MCS)组(n = 11))和一个外部验证队列(包括一个FCS组(n = 5)、一个MCS组(n = 23)和一个正常甘油三酯血症(NTG)组(n = 14))。FCS患者先前已通过LPL和GPIHBP1基因双等位基因致病性遗传变异的存在进行诊断。还测量了LPL活性。记录了临床和人体测量数据,并测量了血脂和脂蛋白。从ROC曲线获得LPL活性的敏感性、特异性和截断点,并进行外部验证。
FCS患者所有肝素后血浆LPL活性均低于25.1 mU/mL,这是表现最佳的截断点。FCS组和MCS组之间的LPL活性分布没有重叠,这与FCS组和NTG组相反。
我们得出结论,除基因检测外,当使用25.1 mU/mL的截断值(验证MCS组平均LPL活性的25%)时,严重高甘油三酯血症患者的LPL活性是FCS诊断的可靠标准。由于敏感性低,我们不推荐基于NTG患者的截断值。