Cox Jacob L, Laughlin Mitzi S, Elkousy Hussein A, Baker Hayley M, Badman Brian L, Ziegler Dean W, Buford Don A, Kruse Kevin K
Texas Education and Research Foundation for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Inc. (TERFSES), Houston, TX, USA.
Fondren Orthopedic Research Institute (FORI), Houston, TX, USA.
JSES Int. 2021 Nov 24;7(1):21-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.10.008. eCollection 2023 Jan.
The use of ultrasound as a viable diagnostic tool for routine office visit evaluation of rotator cuff integrity is slowly gaining acceptance in orthopedic practice. However, the reliability of accurately assessing rotator cuff tear reparability by ultrasound has limited evidence in the literature. The purpose of this study was to compare preoperative assessment of cuff tear reparability via ultrasound with the arthroscopic determination of reparability at the time of surgery.
We prospectively collected preoperative ultrasound and arthroscopic imaging data on 145 patients (80 or 55% men and average age of 60.7 years) who underwent arthroscopic posterior superior rotator cuff repair. Three independent experienced orthopedic surgeons retrospectively reviewed all ultrasound studies and arthroscopic imaging and determined if the posterior superior rotator cuff tendon edge was able to be viewed via ultrasound and determined with the arthroscopic images if the tear was reparable.
On review of the ultrasound and arthroscopic data, if the edge of the rotator cuff tendon was able to be viewed on the coronal ultrasound image, it was most likely reparable with a positive predictive value of 97.6% and a positive likelihood ratio of 5.8. Sensitivity was 84.4%, and specificity was 76.9%. The negative predictive value was 37.5%, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.17. The interobserver reliability was 0.63, and the observers were unanimous in determining the tendon edge was able to be visualized in 99 of 145 cases (68%).
Preoperative ultrasound evaluation of the shoulder for posterior superior rotator cuff tears is a useful tool for assessing rotator cuff integrity and may help predict intraoperative reparability of the tendon. This study demonstrates that if the cuff tear edge is able to be visualized, there is a high probability of successful arthroscopic restoration of the tendon to its native attachment. Conversely, if the tear edge is unable to be visualized, there is a moderate chance of the tear being irreparable. These results help expand the knowledge base of the usefulness of in-office ultrasound performed by the surgeon in predicting the results of surgical intervention for rotator cuff tears.
超声作为一种可行的诊断工具,用于常规门诊评估肩袖完整性,在骨科实践中逐渐得到认可。然而,超声准确评估肩袖撕裂可修复性的可靠性在文献中的证据有限。本研究的目的是比较术前通过超声对肩袖撕裂可修复性的评估与手术时通过关节镜确定的可修复性。
我们前瞻性收集了145例接受关节镜下后上肩袖修复患者(80例或55%为男性,平均年龄60.7岁)的术前超声和关节镜成像数据。三名独立且经验丰富的骨科医生回顾了所有超声检查和关节镜成像,并确定后上肩袖肌腱边缘是否能通过超声观察到,以及根据关节镜图像确定撕裂是否可修复。
回顾超声和关节镜数据时,如果在冠状面超声图像上能看到肩袖肌腱边缘,则很可能可修复,阳性预测值为97.6%,阳性似然比为5.8。敏感性为84.4%,特异性为76.9%。阴性预测值为37.5%,阴性似然比为0.17。观察者间可靠性为0.63,在145例病例中的99例(68%)中,观察者一致确定肌腱边缘可被观察到。
术前对肩部后上肩袖撕裂进行超声评估是评估肩袖完整性的有用工具,可能有助于预测术中肌腱的可修复性。本研究表明,如果能看到肩袖撕裂边缘,肌腱在关节镜下成功恢复至其原始附着点的可能性很高。相反,如果撕裂边缘无法看到,则撕裂不可修复的可能性适中。这些结果有助于扩大外科医生在办公室进行超声检查对预测肩袖撕裂手术干预结果的有用性的知识基础。