From Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
University-Children's Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2023 May 1;76(5):652-659. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003745. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
Many protocols and preparations are used for bowel cleansing before pediatric colonoscopy but few are based on scientific evidence. We evaluated efficacy, safety, tolerability, and patient preference of oral sulfate solution (OSS) at 75% of the adult dose versus polyethylene glycol (PEG)-electrolyte solution in adolescents presenting for diagnostic colonoscopy.
Phase III, randomized, evaluator-blinded, non-inferiority study of OSS and PEG in adolescents aged 12-17 years. OSS and PEG were administered in 2 doses on the day before colonoscopy. Primary endpoint included proportion of patients with successful overall preparation (4-point scale). Secondary endpoints included overall and segmental bowel cleansing (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale; BBPS), completed colonoscopies, duration of examination, time to cecal intubation, proportion of nasogastric tubes (NGTs), adverse events (AEs) and acceptability.
Successful cleansing was achieved in 71.4% and 79.0% of patients receiving OSS and PEG, respectively [adjusted difference -7.61 (95% confidence interval, CI, -18.45 to 3.24); P = 0.0907]. Segmental BBPS score for the left and transverse colon were similar between treatment groups, but better for the right colon with PEG than OSS [2.2 (95% CI, 2.0-2.4) and 1.9 (95% CI, 1.7-2.1), respectively; P = 0.0015]. Significantly fewer OSS patients needed NGT placement to ingest the whole solution [9/125 (7.2%)] than PEG patients [36/116 (31.0%); P < 0.0001]. Treatment acceptability was significantly higher with OSS than PEG ( P < 0.0001). Duration of examination, completed colonoscopies, and time to cecal intubation were similar between preparations. Gastrointestinal AEs including nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and distension were similar in both groups but more patients receiving PEG had AEs assessed as incapacitating.
Non-inferiority of OSS to PEG was not demonstrated, but OSS was associated with a lower requirement for NGT, better acceptability, and less frequent severe AEs than with PEG.
许多方案和准备工作用于儿科结肠镜检查前的肠道清洁,但很少有基于科学证据的方案和准备工作。我们评估了口服硫酸盐溶液(OSS)以 75%成人剂量与聚乙二醇(PEG)-电解质溶液在接受诊断性结肠镜检查的青少年中的疗效、安全性、耐受性和患者偏好。
这是一项 OSS 和 PEG 在 12-17 岁青少年中的 III 期、随机、评估者盲、非劣效性研究。OSS 和 PEG 在结肠镜检查前一天分 2 次给药。主要终点包括总体准备成功的患者比例(4 分制)。次要终点包括总体和节段性肠道清洁(波士顿肠道准备量表;BBPS)、完成的结肠镜检查、检查时间、盲肠插管时间、鼻胃管(NGT)的比例、不良事件(AE)和可接受性。
接受 OSS 和 PEG 的患者中分别有 71.4%和 79.0%的患者清洁成功[调整后的差异-7.61(95%置信区间,CI,-18.45 至 3.24);P = 0.0907]。治疗组之间左半结肠和横结肠的节段性 BBPS 评分相似,但 PEG 组右半结肠的评分更好[分别为 2.2(95%CI,2.0-2.4)和 1.9(95%CI,1.7-2.1);P = 0.0015]。需要 NGT 放置以摄入整个溶液的 OSS 患者明显少于 PEG 患者[9/125(7.2%)]比 PEG 患者[36/116(31.0%)];P < 0.0001]。OSS 的治疗可接受性明显高于 PEG(P < 0.0001)。检查时间、完成的结肠镜检查和盲肠插管时间在两种制剂之间相似。包括恶心、呕吐、腹痛和腹胀在内的胃肠道 AE 在两组中相似,但接受 PEG 的患者中更频繁地发生评估为使人丧失能力的 AE。
OSS 与 PEG 相比不具有非劣效性,但与 PEG 相比,OSS 与 NGT 的需求降低、更好的可接受性和更频繁的严重 AE 相关。